Disability disaggregation of Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) in the Pacific

A review of system capacity.

Beth Sprunt, Manjula Marella, Umesh Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Pacific Island governments have to report against an increasing number and range of global and regional education indicators that require disability-disaggregated data for monitoring disability-inclusive education. Given the effort required to adapt data systems and build capacity for disability disaggregation, it is imperative that indicators provide optimal information to inform policy and planning. This paper reviews current approaches to disability data collection and disaggregation within Education Management Information Systems (EMISs) across 14 Pacific Island countries. It compares disability-related education indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Incheon Strategy, and the Pacific Education Development Framework in relation to current capacity of Pacific EMISs to report against these. Amongst the countries studied, the most common approach to EMIS disability disaggregation is to categorise children based on impairments, which is less reliable and comparable as a measure than categories based on difficulties in functioning. Data on school accessibility,human resources related to inclusion and learning support needs is rarely included in EMISs and then only sparsely. Measurement of regional and global disability indicators requires minor to substantial adaptations to the EMISs, outlined in the paper at a country-specific level. ‘Granular’ EMISs, which are based on individual student electronic files, are increasingly common in the Pacific and offer greater capacity for disability disaggregation and analysis of data. A range of recommendations are discussed for enhancing the data systems to enable reporting against the indicators and a more useful evidence base for disability-inclusive education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-68
Number of pages28
JournalKnowledge Management for Development Journal
Volume11
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • disability disaggregation
  • education management information system (EMIS)
  • disability-inclusive education
  • indicators
  • Pacific islands

Cite this

@article{fe5f2b14090f4d76bc7f429e468cccb3,
title = "Disability disaggregation of Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) in the Pacific: A review of system capacity.",
abstract = "Pacific Island governments have to report against an increasing number and range of global and regional education indicators that require disability-disaggregated data for monitoring disability-inclusive education. Given the effort required to adapt data systems and build capacity for disability disaggregation, it is imperative that indicators provide optimal information to inform policy and planning. This paper reviews current approaches to disability data collection and disaggregation within Education Management Information Systems (EMISs) across 14 Pacific Island countries. It compares disability-related education indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Incheon Strategy, and the Pacific Education Development Framework in relation to current capacity of Pacific EMISs to report against these. Amongst the countries studied, the most common approach to EMIS disability disaggregation is to categorise children based on impairments, which is less reliable and comparable as a measure than categories based on difficulties in functioning. Data on school accessibility,human resources related to inclusion and learning support needs is rarely included in EMISs and then only sparsely. Measurement of regional and global disability indicators requires minor to substantial adaptations to the EMISs, outlined in the paper at a country-specific level. ‘Granular’ EMISs, which are based on individual student electronic files, are increasingly common in the Pacific and offer greater capacity for disability disaggregation and analysis of data. A range of recommendations are discussed for enhancing the data systems to enable reporting against the indicators and a more useful evidence base for disability-inclusive education.",
keywords = "disability disaggregation, education management information system (EMIS), disability-inclusive education, indicators, Pacific islands",
author = "Beth Sprunt and Manjula Marella and Umesh Sharma",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "41--68",
journal = "Knowledge Management for Development Journal",
issn = "1947-4199",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Disability disaggregation of Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) in the Pacific : A review of system capacity. / Sprunt, Beth; Marella, Manjula; Sharma, Umesh.

In: Knowledge Management for Development Journal, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2016, p. 41-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disability disaggregation of Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) in the Pacific

T2 - A review of system capacity.

AU - Sprunt, Beth

AU - Marella, Manjula

AU - Sharma, Umesh

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Pacific Island governments have to report against an increasing number and range of global and regional education indicators that require disability-disaggregated data for monitoring disability-inclusive education. Given the effort required to adapt data systems and build capacity for disability disaggregation, it is imperative that indicators provide optimal information to inform policy and planning. This paper reviews current approaches to disability data collection and disaggregation within Education Management Information Systems (EMISs) across 14 Pacific Island countries. It compares disability-related education indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Incheon Strategy, and the Pacific Education Development Framework in relation to current capacity of Pacific EMISs to report against these. Amongst the countries studied, the most common approach to EMIS disability disaggregation is to categorise children based on impairments, which is less reliable and comparable as a measure than categories based on difficulties in functioning. Data on school accessibility,human resources related to inclusion and learning support needs is rarely included in EMISs and then only sparsely. Measurement of regional and global disability indicators requires minor to substantial adaptations to the EMISs, outlined in the paper at a country-specific level. ‘Granular’ EMISs, which are based on individual student electronic files, are increasingly common in the Pacific and offer greater capacity for disability disaggregation and analysis of data. A range of recommendations are discussed for enhancing the data systems to enable reporting against the indicators and a more useful evidence base for disability-inclusive education.

AB - Pacific Island governments have to report against an increasing number and range of global and regional education indicators that require disability-disaggregated data for monitoring disability-inclusive education. Given the effort required to adapt data systems and build capacity for disability disaggregation, it is imperative that indicators provide optimal information to inform policy and planning. This paper reviews current approaches to disability data collection and disaggregation within Education Management Information Systems (EMISs) across 14 Pacific Island countries. It compares disability-related education indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the Incheon Strategy, and the Pacific Education Development Framework in relation to current capacity of Pacific EMISs to report against these. Amongst the countries studied, the most common approach to EMIS disability disaggregation is to categorise children based on impairments, which is less reliable and comparable as a measure than categories based on difficulties in functioning. Data on school accessibility,human resources related to inclusion and learning support needs is rarely included in EMISs and then only sparsely. Measurement of regional and global disability indicators requires minor to substantial adaptations to the EMISs, outlined in the paper at a country-specific level. ‘Granular’ EMISs, which are based on individual student electronic files, are increasingly common in the Pacific and offer greater capacity for disability disaggregation and analysis of data. A range of recommendations are discussed for enhancing the data systems to enable reporting against the indicators and a more useful evidence base for disability-inclusive education.

KW - disability disaggregation

KW - education management information system (EMIS)

KW - disability-inclusive education

KW - indicators

KW - Pacific islands

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 41

EP - 68

JO - Knowledge Management for Development Journal

JF - Knowledge Management for Development Journal

SN - 1947-4199

IS - 1

ER -