TY - JOUR
T1 - Dignity during work-integrated learning
T2 - Piloting an online learning resource for placement students and supervisors
AU - Sarkar, Mahbub
AU - Davis, Corinne
AU - King, Olivia
AU - Wahid, Kadheeja
AU - Rees, Charlotte E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The development and evaluation of the resource was funded by a Monash Education Academy Inter-Faculty Transformation Grant, Monash University, Australia [November 2017], with Prof. Charlotte Rees as the Principal Investigator. We thank our collaborators involved in the foundational research for the resource (Allie Clemans, Jan Coles, Paul Crampton, Nicky Jacobs, Tui McKeown, Julia Morphet, and Kate Seear); and those involved in its development, including The Learning Hook. We also thank Tammie Choi for her co-supervision of Kadheeja Wahid and express our gratitude to evaluation participants for their feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - What was the educational challenge? Medical student abuse within work-integrated learning (WIL) is well-reported, with negative consequences for wellbeing, motivation, and learning. Conversely, workplace dignity, described as respecting the worth of others and self, has positive impacts on wellbeing, learning, and relationships for WIL students and supervisors. Stakeholders often struggle to articulate what workplace dignity means, and can downplay or do nothing in the face of WIL indignities. What was the solution and how was this implemented? We created an innovative research-informed online learning resource about WIL dignity to improve stakeholders’ understandings and help them get the best from WIL placements ensuring these are dignified, safe, and educationally productive. The resource included three topics: (a) workplace dignity and why it matters; (b) upholding dignity; and (c) strengthening dignity. What lessons were learned? We conducted a pilot qualitative evaluation involving 13 semi-structured interviews with students and supervisors to elicit their views and experiences of the resource. Our key findings across three overarching categories were: (1) perceived benefits (motivations to complete the resource; content of the resource; online pedagogies); (2) potential applications of learning (reinforcing existing knowledge; developing new knowledge; promoting reflection; changing workplace practices); and (3) suggested improvements (barriers to resource use; resource content; online pedagogies; timing of resource implementation; embedding the resource in broader learning). What are the next steps? Although we identified numerous perceived benefits, and applications of learning, the findings suggested opportunities for further development, especially improving the resource’s social interactivity. We recommend that further resource implementation includes student-educator and student-peer interactivity to maximise learning, and longitudinal evaluation of the resource.
AB - What was the educational challenge? Medical student abuse within work-integrated learning (WIL) is well-reported, with negative consequences for wellbeing, motivation, and learning. Conversely, workplace dignity, described as respecting the worth of others and self, has positive impacts on wellbeing, learning, and relationships for WIL students and supervisors. Stakeholders often struggle to articulate what workplace dignity means, and can downplay or do nothing in the face of WIL indignities. What was the solution and how was this implemented? We created an innovative research-informed online learning resource about WIL dignity to improve stakeholders’ understandings and help them get the best from WIL placements ensuring these are dignified, safe, and educationally productive. The resource included three topics: (a) workplace dignity and why it matters; (b) upholding dignity; and (c) strengthening dignity. What lessons were learned? We conducted a pilot qualitative evaluation involving 13 semi-structured interviews with students and supervisors to elicit their views and experiences of the resource. Our key findings across three overarching categories were: (1) perceived benefits (motivations to complete the resource; content of the resource; online pedagogies); (2) potential applications of learning (reinforcing existing knowledge; developing new knowledge; promoting reflection; changing workplace practices); and (3) suggested improvements (barriers to resource use; resource content; online pedagogies; timing of resource implementation; embedding the resource in broader learning). What are the next steps? Although we identified numerous perceived benefits, and applications of learning, the findings suggested opportunities for further development, especially improving the resource’s social interactivity. We recommend that further resource implementation includes student-educator and student-peer interactivity to maximise learning, and longitudinal evaluation of the resource.
KW - Dignity
KW - health professions education
KW - medical education
KW - online learning
KW - work-integrated learning (WIL)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175634298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2272775
DO - 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2272775
M3 - Article
C2 - 37909884
AN - SCOPUS:85175634298
SN - 1466-187X
VL - 46
SP - 179
EP - 182
JO - Medical Teacher
JF - Medical Teacher
IS - 2
ER -