In coastal regions, age-0 juveniles of many fish species are capable of recruiting to either marine or estuarine nursery habitats, yet the ecological consequences for cohorts that use marine versus estuarine nurseries is poorly understood. In the present study, stable isotope (I 13C, I 15N) and stomach contents data were used to compare trophic ecology associated with differential habitat use for age-0 bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix and bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli from 2 habitats: Marylanda??s (USA) inner continental shelf (shelf) and lower Chesapeake Bay (estuary). Bluefish occupied equivalent trophic positions (approx. 4.0 to 4.2; I 15N- and diet-based estimates) as tertiary consumers in the shelf and estuary. In contrast, bay anchovy were secondary-tertiary consumers with trophic position estimates of 3.5 to 3.8 in the shelf and 3.5 in the estuary. A C:N ratio proxy for lipid content was higher in the shelf cohorts for both species, and weight-at-length was also higher for shelf bay anchovy than estuarine bay anchovy. Estuarine cohorts of both species occupied a larger isotopic niche (i.e. convex hull area), yet 2-source mixing model results indicated that estuarine cohorts derived >80 of their biomass from pelagic food webs alone. Conversely, shelf cohorts more equitably integrated pelagic (bluefish: 45 A? 7 [SD], bay anchovy: 46 A? 12 ) and benthic food webs. The present study indicates that the juvenile trophic niche of these species can vary significantly across habitats and provides initial evidence that cohorts recruiting to Marylanda??s shelf can realize more diverse (i.e. utilization of multiple food webs) or superior (i.e. increased conditiona??bay anchovy only) foraging conditions than cohorts recruiting to proximal estuaries.
|Pages (from-to)||241 - 254|
|Number of pages||14|
|Journal||Marine Ecology-Progress Series|
|Publication status||Published - 2011|