Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada

Mark Gilbert, Kimberly Thomson, Travis Salway, Devon Haag, Troy Grennan, Christopher K. Fairley, Chris Buchner, Mel Krajden, Perry Kendall, Jean Shoveller, Gina Ogilvie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Internet-based STI testing programmes may overcome barriers posed by in-clinic testing, though uptake could reflect social gradients. The role these services play in comparison to clinical testing services is unknown. We compared experiences of testing barriers between STI clinic clients to clients of GetCheckedOnline.com (GCO; where clients take a printed lab form to a lab). Methods: Our 10-month cross-sectional study was conducted after GCO was promoted to STI clinic clients and men who have sex with men (MSM). Clinic and GCO clients completed an online survey assessing testing barriers and facilitators; responses were compared using bivariate analysis (level of significance P<0.01; significant results below). Results: Compared with 321 clinic clients, the 73 GCO clients were more likely to be older (median 35 vs 30 years), MSM (45% vs 16%), be testing routinely (67% vs 39%), have delayed testing for any reason (76% vs 54%) and due to clinic distance (28% vs 9%), report delays due to wait times (50% vs 17%), embarrassment with testing (16% vs 6%), discomfort discussing sexual health where they usually go for testing (39% vs 22%), as well as discomfort discussing sexual history with (19% vs 5%) and fearing judgement from (30% vs 15%) any healthcare provider. GCO clients were less likely to have found clinic hours convenient (59% vs 77%) and clinic appointments easy to make (49% vs 66%), and more likely to report long wait times (50% vs 17%). We found no differences in technology skills/use. Conclusions: In this urban setting, an internet-based testing service effectively engaged individuals experiencing testing barriers, with few social gradients in uptake. While some testing barriers could be addressed through increasing access to clinical services, others require social and structural changes, highlighting the importance of internet-based STI testing services to increasing test uptake.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-156
Number of pages6
JournalSexually Transmitted Infections
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • gay men
  • intervention studies
  • public health
  • testing

Cite this

Gilbert, Mark ; Thomson, Kimberly ; Salway, Travis ; Haag, Devon ; Grennan, Troy ; Fairley, Christopher K. ; Buchner, Chris ; Krajden, Mel ; Kendall, Perry ; Shoveller, Jean ; Ogilvie, Gina. / Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada. In: Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2019 ; Vol. 95, No. 2. pp. 151-156.
@article{b0e0c620d9144f9f8ac14553ba1143cb,
title = "Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada",
abstract = "Objectives: Internet-based STI testing programmes may overcome barriers posed by in-clinic testing, though uptake could reflect social gradients. The role these services play in comparison to clinical testing services is unknown. We compared experiences of testing barriers between STI clinic clients to clients of GetCheckedOnline.com (GCO; where clients take a printed lab form to a lab). Methods: Our 10-month cross-sectional study was conducted after GCO was promoted to STI clinic clients and men who have sex with men (MSM). Clinic and GCO clients completed an online survey assessing testing barriers and facilitators; responses were compared using bivariate analysis (level of significance P<0.01; significant results below). Results: Compared with 321 clinic clients, the 73 GCO clients were more likely to be older (median 35 vs 30 years), MSM (45{\%} vs 16{\%}), be testing routinely (67{\%} vs 39{\%}), have delayed testing for any reason (76{\%} vs 54{\%}) and due to clinic distance (28{\%} vs 9{\%}), report delays due to wait times (50{\%} vs 17{\%}), embarrassment with testing (16{\%} vs 6{\%}), discomfort discussing sexual health where they usually go for testing (39{\%} vs 22{\%}), as well as discomfort discussing sexual history with (19{\%} vs 5{\%}) and fearing judgement from (30{\%} vs 15{\%}) any healthcare provider. GCO clients were less likely to have found clinic hours convenient (59{\%} vs 77{\%}) and clinic appointments easy to make (49{\%} vs 66{\%}), and more likely to report long wait times (50{\%} vs 17{\%}). We found no differences in technology skills/use. Conclusions: In this urban setting, an internet-based testing service effectively engaged individuals experiencing testing barriers, with few social gradients in uptake. While some testing barriers could be addressed through increasing access to clinical services, others require social and structural changes, highlighting the importance of internet-based STI testing services to increasing test uptake.",
keywords = "gay men, intervention studies, public health, testing",
author = "Mark Gilbert and Kimberly Thomson and Travis Salway and Devon Haag and Troy Grennan and Fairley, {Christopher K.} and Chris Buchner and Mel Krajden and Perry Kendall and Jean Shoveller and Gina Ogilvie",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1136/sextrans-2017-053325",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "151--156",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Infections",
issn = "1368-4973",
publisher = "BMJ Group",
number = "2",

}

Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada. / Gilbert, Mark; Thomson, Kimberly; Salway, Travis; Haag, Devon; Grennan, Troy; Fairley, Christopher K.; Buchner, Chris; Krajden, Mel; Kendall, Perry; Shoveller, Jean; Ogilvie, Gina.

In: Sexually Transmitted Infections, Vol. 95, No. 2, 2019, p. 151-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in experiences of barriers to STI testing between clients of the internet-based diagnostic testing service GetCheckedOnline.com and an STI clinic in Vancouver, Canada

AU - Gilbert, Mark

AU - Thomson, Kimberly

AU - Salway, Travis

AU - Haag, Devon

AU - Grennan, Troy

AU - Fairley, Christopher K.

AU - Buchner, Chris

AU - Krajden, Mel

AU - Kendall, Perry

AU - Shoveller, Jean

AU - Ogilvie, Gina

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objectives: Internet-based STI testing programmes may overcome barriers posed by in-clinic testing, though uptake could reflect social gradients. The role these services play in comparison to clinical testing services is unknown. We compared experiences of testing barriers between STI clinic clients to clients of GetCheckedOnline.com (GCO; where clients take a printed lab form to a lab). Methods: Our 10-month cross-sectional study was conducted after GCO was promoted to STI clinic clients and men who have sex with men (MSM). Clinic and GCO clients completed an online survey assessing testing barriers and facilitators; responses were compared using bivariate analysis (level of significance P<0.01; significant results below). Results: Compared with 321 clinic clients, the 73 GCO clients were more likely to be older (median 35 vs 30 years), MSM (45% vs 16%), be testing routinely (67% vs 39%), have delayed testing for any reason (76% vs 54%) and due to clinic distance (28% vs 9%), report delays due to wait times (50% vs 17%), embarrassment with testing (16% vs 6%), discomfort discussing sexual health where they usually go for testing (39% vs 22%), as well as discomfort discussing sexual history with (19% vs 5%) and fearing judgement from (30% vs 15%) any healthcare provider. GCO clients were less likely to have found clinic hours convenient (59% vs 77%) and clinic appointments easy to make (49% vs 66%), and more likely to report long wait times (50% vs 17%). We found no differences in technology skills/use. Conclusions: In this urban setting, an internet-based testing service effectively engaged individuals experiencing testing barriers, with few social gradients in uptake. While some testing barriers could be addressed through increasing access to clinical services, others require social and structural changes, highlighting the importance of internet-based STI testing services to increasing test uptake.

AB - Objectives: Internet-based STI testing programmes may overcome barriers posed by in-clinic testing, though uptake could reflect social gradients. The role these services play in comparison to clinical testing services is unknown. We compared experiences of testing barriers between STI clinic clients to clients of GetCheckedOnline.com (GCO; where clients take a printed lab form to a lab). Methods: Our 10-month cross-sectional study was conducted after GCO was promoted to STI clinic clients and men who have sex with men (MSM). Clinic and GCO clients completed an online survey assessing testing barriers and facilitators; responses were compared using bivariate analysis (level of significance P<0.01; significant results below). Results: Compared with 321 clinic clients, the 73 GCO clients were more likely to be older (median 35 vs 30 years), MSM (45% vs 16%), be testing routinely (67% vs 39%), have delayed testing for any reason (76% vs 54%) and due to clinic distance (28% vs 9%), report delays due to wait times (50% vs 17%), embarrassment with testing (16% vs 6%), discomfort discussing sexual health where they usually go for testing (39% vs 22%), as well as discomfort discussing sexual history with (19% vs 5%) and fearing judgement from (30% vs 15%) any healthcare provider. GCO clients were less likely to have found clinic hours convenient (59% vs 77%) and clinic appointments easy to make (49% vs 66%), and more likely to report long wait times (50% vs 17%). We found no differences in technology skills/use. Conclusions: In this urban setting, an internet-based testing service effectively engaged individuals experiencing testing barriers, with few social gradients in uptake. While some testing barriers could be addressed through increasing access to clinical services, others require social and structural changes, highlighting the importance of internet-based STI testing services to increasing test uptake.

KW - gay men

KW - intervention studies

KW - public health

KW - testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049068230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053325

DO - 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053325

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 151

EP - 156

JO - Sexually Transmitted Infections

JF - Sexually Transmitted Infections

SN - 1368-4973

IS - 2

ER -