Dialyzer performance in the clinic: Comparison of six low-flux membranes

Peter G. Kerr, Angela Lo, Man Moo Chin, Robert C. Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical performance of 6 different low-flux dialysis membranes under steady-state conditions in terms of urea and phosphate clearances. Ten stable hemodialysis patients were examined. The following dialyzers were studied, all in 1.5to 1.6-m2 format: cuprammonium, cellulose acetate, cellulose diacetate, hemophane, polysulfone (low-flux), and polysynthane. The following parameters were examined: urea reduction ratio, phosphate reduction ratio, 'instantaneous dialyzer clearance' for urea and phosphate, and total amount of urea and phosphate removed in the dialysate over a 1-week (three dialyses) period. Although there were differences between the membranes, all produced results within a narrow range. There was no one membrane that produced superior clearances in all categories. The cellulose acetate membrane was the least satisfactory membrane. Phosphate clearances were at best one third that of urea clearances. When choosing a low-flux dialysis membrane, urea and phosphate clearances are so similar amongst different membranes that other criteria are likely to have a greater influence on the choice of membrane.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)817-821
Number of pages5
JournalArtificial Organs
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Oct 1999

Keywords

  • Hemodialysis
  • Low-flux dialysis membranes

Cite this

@article{815632485b0c45889a4a2544f585a879,
title = "Dialyzer performance in the clinic: Comparison of six low-flux membranes",
abstract = "The aim of this study is to assess the clinical performance of 6 different low-flux dialysis membranes under steady-state conditions in terms of urea and phosphate clearances. Ten stable hemodialysis patients were examined. The following dialyzers were studied, all in 1.5to 1.6-m2 format: cuprammonium, cellulose acetate, cellulose diacetate, hemophane, polysulfone (low-flux), and polysynthane. The following parameters were examined: urea reduction ratio, phosphate reduction ratio, 'instantaneous dialyzer clearance' for urea and phosphate, and total amount of urea and phosphate removed in the dialysate over a 1-week (three dialyses) period. Although there were differences between the membranes, all produced results within a narrow range. There was no one membrane that produced superior clearances in all categories. The cellulose acetate membrane was the least satisfactory membrane. Phosphate clearances were at best one third that of urea clearances. When choosing a low-flux dialysis membrane, urea and phosphate clearances are so similar amongst different membranes that other criteria are likely to have a greater influence on the choice of membrane.",
keywords = "Hemodialysis, Low-flux dialysis membranes",
author = "Kerr, {Peter G.} and Angela Lo and Chin, {Man Moo} and Atkins, {Robert C.}",
year = "1999",
month = "10",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06297.x",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "817--821",
journal = "Artificial Organs",
issn = "0160-564X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

Dialyzer performance in the clinic : Comparison of six low-flux membranes. / Kerr, Peter G.; Lo, Angela; Chin, Man Moo; Atkins, Robert C.

In: Artificial Organs, Vol. 23, No. 9, 04.10.1999, p. 817-821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dialyzer performance in the clinic

T2 - Comparison of six low-flux membranes

AU - Kerr, Peter G.

AU - Lo, Angela

AU - Chin, Man Moo

AU - Atkins, Robert C.

PY - 1999/10/4

Y1 - 1999/10/4

N2 - The aim of this study is to assess the clinical performance of 6 different low-flux dialysis membranes under steady-state conditions in terms of urea and phosphate clearances. Ten stable hemodialysis patients were examined. The following dialyzers were studied, all in 1.5to 1.6-m2 format: cuprammonium, cellulose acetate, cellulose diacetate, hemophane, polysulfone (low-flux), and polysynthane. The following parameters were examined: urea reduction ratio, phosphate reduction ratio, 'instantaneous dialyzer clearance' for urea and phosphate, and total amount of urea and phosphate removed in the dialysate over a 1-week (three dialyses) period. Although there were differences between the membranes, all produced results within a narrow range. There was no one membrane that produced superior clearances in all categories. The cellulose acetate membrane was the least satisfactory membrane. Phosphate clearances were at best one third that of urea clearances. When choosing a low-flux dialysis membrane, urea and phosphate clearances are so similar amongst different membranes that other criteria are likely to have a greater influence on the choice of membrane.

AB - The aim of this study is to assess the clinical performance of 6 different low-flux dialysis membranes under steady-state conditions in terms of urea and phosphate clearances. Ten stable hemodialysis patients were examined. The following dialyzers were studied, all in 1.5to 1.6-m2 format: cuprammonium, cellulose acetate, cellulose diacetate, hemophane, polysulfone (low-flux), and polysynthane. The following parameters were examined: urea reduction ratio, phosphate reduction ratio, 'instantaneous dialyzer clearance' for urea and phosphate, and total amount of urea and phosphate removed in the dialysate over a 1-week (three dialyses) period. Although there were differences between the membranes, all produced results within a narrow range. There was no one membrane that produced superior clearances in all categories. The cellulose acetate membrane was the least satisfactory membrane. Phosphate clearances were at best one third that of urea clearances. When choosing a low-flux dialysis membrane, urea and phosphate clearances are so similar amongst different membranes that other criteria are likely to have a greater influence on the choice of membrane.

KW - Hemodialysis

KW - Low-flux dialysis membranes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032836619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06297.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06297.x

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 817

EP - 821

JO - Artificial Organs

JF - Artificial Organs

SN - 0160-564X

IS - 9

ER -