Dialyzer performance in the clinic: Comparison of six low-flux membranes

Peter G. Kerr, Angela Lo, Man Moo Chin, Robert C. Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)


The aim of this study is to assess the clinical performance of 6 different low-flux dialysis membranes under steady-state conditions in terms of urea and phosphate clearances. Ten stable hemodialysis patients were examined. The following dialyzers were studied, all in 1.5to 1.6-m2 format: cuprammonium, cellulose acetate, cellulose diacetate, hemophane, polysulfone (low-flux), and polysynthane. The following parameters were examined: urea reduction ratio, phosphate reduction ratio, 'instantaneous dialyzer clearance' for urea and phosphate, and total amount of urea and phosphate removed in the dialysate over a 1-week (three dialyses) period. Although there were differences between the membranes, all produced results within a narrow range. There was no one membrane that produced superior clearances in all categories. The cellulose acetate membrane was the least satisfactory membrane. Phosphate clearances were at best one third that of urea clearances. When choosing a low-flux dialysis membrane, urea and phosphate clearances are so similar amongst different membranes that other criteria are likely to have a greater influence on the choice of membrane.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)817-821
Number of pages5
JournalArtificial Organs
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 4 Oct 1999


  • Hemodialysis
  • Low-flux dialysis membranes

Cite this