TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a local model for measuring the work of surgeons
AU - Forootan, Sara
AU - Hajebrahimi, Sakineh
AU - Janati, Ali
AU - Najafi, Behzad
AU - Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mohammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2021 by Turkish Surgical Society Available online at www.turkjsurg.com
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objective: The Relative Value Unit (RVU) is the main method of calculating surgeons’ reimbursements and a tool for measuring the work of surgeons. Existing evidence shows that the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) does not accurately represent surgeon’s work. Therefore, the current study attempted to develop a local model to measure surgeons’ work. Material and Methods: This study was conducted in two main phases of determining the metrics and model development using quantitative and qualitative approaches from December 2019 to April 2021. Literature review, focused group discussions, and interviews were used to collect data. Content analysis and Exploratory Data Analysis techniques were applied to analyze data. Results: The findings demonstrated that patient’s conditions (age, severity of disease at referring time, and comorbidities), disease specifications (time, complexity, physical effort, and risk), and provider characteristic (surgeon’s willingness, imposed stress, and surgeon’s skill) were important by 17, 51, and 32%, respectively, in determining surgeons’ work. Conclusion: Determining a fixed value for each procedure does not accurately estimate the amount of required surgeon’s work for any procedure. Many factors, such as the patient’s condition, surgeon’s characteristics, and disease specification affect surgeons’ work in the operation room. Proper measurement of the surgeon’s work is an important step towards establishing equity in payment in the health system.
AB - Objective: The Relative Value Unit (RVU) is the main method of calculating surgeons’ reimbursements and a tool for measuring the work of surgeons. Existing evidence shows that the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) does not accurately represent surgeon’s work. Therefore, the current study attempted to develop a local model to measure surgeons’ work. Material and Methods: This study was conducted in two main phases of determining the metrics and model development using quantitative and qualitative approaches from December 2019 to April 2021. Literature review, focused group discussions, and interviews were used to collect data. Content analysis and Exploratory Data Analysis techniques were applied to analyze data. Results: The findings demonstrated that patient’s conditions (age, severity of disease at referring time, and comorbidities), disease specifications (time, complexity, physical effort, and risk), and provider characteristic (surgeon’s willingness, imposed stress, and surgeon’s skill) were important by 17, 51, and 32%, respectively, in determining surgeons’ work. Conclusion: Determining a fixed value for each procedure does not accurately estimate the amount of required surgeon’s work for any procedure. Many factors, such as the patient’s condition, surgeon’s characteristics, and disease specification affect surgeons’ work in the operation room. Proper measurement of the surgeon’s work is an important step towards establishing equity in payment in the health system.
KW - Measurement
KW - Relative value unit
KW - Surgeon’s work
KW - Work relative value unit
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85124188221
U2 - 10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5473
DO - 10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5473
M3 - Article
C2 - 35677492
AN - SCOPUS:85124188221
SN - 2564-6850
VL - 37
SP - 371
EP - 378
JO - Turkish Journal of Surgery
JF - Turkish Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -