TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing the Freezing of Gait Severity Tool
T2 - A Delphi consensus study to determine the content of a clinician-rated assessment for freezing of gait severity
AU - Scully, Aileen E.
AU - de Oliveira, Beatriz I.R.
AU - Hill, Keith D.
AU - Tan, Dawn
AU - Pua, Yong Hao
AU - Clark, Ross
AU - Burton, Elissa
N1 - Funding Information:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies. Aileen E. Scully is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Objectives: There is no standardisation of tasks or measures for evaluation of freezing of gait severity in people with Parkinson's disease. This study aimed to develop a clinician-rated tool for freezing of gait severity (i.e. Freezing of Gait Severity Tool), through determining clinicians’ ratings of the most important triggering circumstances to be examined and aspects of freezing of gait to be measured. Design: A three-round, web-based Delphi study. Participants: Healthcare professionals, with at least five years’ experience in managing freezing of gait in people with Parkinson. Main outcome measures: Round 1 required participants (n = 28) to rate items on a 5-point Likert scale, based on priority for inclusion in the Freezing of Gait Severity Tool. In Round 2, participants (n = 18) ranked the items based on priority for inclusion. In Round 3, participants (n = 18) confirmed or rejected the shortlisted items by judging their ability, on a binary scale, to screen for freezing of gait, detect changes in freezing severity, and discriminate between degrees of severity. Results: Participants agreed with the triggering circumstances of turning hesitation, narrow space hesitation, start hesitation, cognitive dual-tasking, and open space hesitation should be assessed; and the aspects of gait freezing to be measured included freezing type, number of freezing episodes during a task, and average duration of freezing episodes. Conclusions: This study attained a consensus for the items to be included in a clinician-rated tool for freezing of gait severity. Future studies should investigate psychometric properties and clinical feasibility of the Freezing of Gait Severity Tool.
AB - Objectives: There is no standardisation of tasks or measures for evaluation of freezing of gait severity in people with Parkinson's disease. This study aimed to develop a clinician-rated tool for freezing of gait severity (i.e. Freezing of Gait Severity Tool), through determining clinicians’ ratings of the most important triggering circumstances to be examined and aspects of freezing of gait to be measured. Design: A three-round, web-based Delphi study. Participants: Healthcare professionals, with at least five years’ experience in managing freezing of gait in people with Parkinson. Main outcome measures: Round 1 required participants (n = 28) to rate items on a 5-point Likert scale, based on priority for inclusion in the Freezing of Gait Severity Tool. In Round 2, participants (n = 18) ranked the items based on priority for inclusion. In Round 3, participants (n = 18) confirmed or rejected the shortlisted items by judging their ability, on a binary scale, to screen for freezing of gait, detect changes in freezing severity, and discriminate between degrees of severity. Results: Participants agreed with the triggering circumstances of turning hesitation, narrow space hesitation, start hesitation, cognitive dual-tasking, and open space hesitation should be assessed; and the aspects of gait freezing to be measured included freezing type, number of freezing episodes during a task, and average duration of freezing episodes. Conclusions: This study attained a consensus for the items to be included in a clinician-rated tool for freezing of gait severity. Future studies should investigate psychometric properties and clinical feasibility of the Freezing of Gait Severity Tool.
KW - assessment
KW - clinician-rated tool
KW - freezing of gait
KW - Parkinson's disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138266802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/02692155221121180
DO - 10.1177/02692155221121180
M3 - Article
C2 - 36113421
AN - SCOPUS:85138266802
SN - 0269-2155
VL - 36
SP - 1679
EP - 1693
JO - Clinical Rehabilitation
JF - Clinical Rehabilitation
IS - 12
ER -