Developing the first Bi-National clinical quality registry for burns - Lessons learned so far

Dina Watterson; Belinda Gabbe; Heather Cleland; Dale Edgar; Peter Cameron

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.005

Developing the first Bi-National clinical quality registry for burns - Lessons learned so far

Dina Watterson, Belinda Gabbe, Heather Cleland, Dale Edgar, Peter Cameron

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior to 2004, Australia and New Zealand lacked a systematic method to measure burn incidence, aetiology and quality of care or outcomes for burn patients. The Australian and New Zealand Burn Association (ANZBA) commenced the Bi-National Burns Registry (Bi-NBR) at that time. As a result of the limitations identified with the registry, ANZBA collaborated with Monash University to develop the registry as a clinical quality registry.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	52 - 60
Number of pages	9
Journal	Burns
Volume	38
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.005
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.005

Cite this

@article{a877f6a727ee4bb98ac28208a507c3b8,

title = "Developing the first Bi-National clinical quality registry for burns - Lessons learned so far",

abstract = "Prior to 2004, Australia and New Zealand lacked a systematic method to measure burn incidence, aetiology and quality of care or outcomes for burn patients. The Australian and New Zealand Burn Association (ANZBA) commenced the Bi-National Burns Registry (Bi-NBR) at that time. As a result of the limitations identified with the registry, ANZBA collaborated with Monash University to develop the registry as a clinical quality registry.",

author = "Dina Watterson and Belinda Gabbe and Heather Cleland and Dale Edgar and Peter Cameron",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.005",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "52 -- 60",

journal = "Burns",

issn = "0305-4179",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing the first Bi-National clinical quality registry for burns - Lessons learned so far

AU - Watterson, Dina

AU - Gabbe, Belinda

AU - Cleland, Heather

AU - Edgar, Dale

AU - Cameron, Peter

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Prior to 2004, Australia and New Zealand lacked a systematic method to measure burn incidence, aetiology and quality of care or outcomes for burn patients. The Australian and New Zealand Burn Association (ANZBA) commenced the Bi-National Burns Registry (Bi-NBR) at that time. As a result of the limitations identified with the registry, ANZBA collaborated with Monash University to develop the registry as a clinical quality registry.

AB - Prior to 2004, Australia and New Zealand lacked a systematic method to measure burn incidence, aetiology and quality of care or outcomes for burn patients. The Australian and New Zealand Burn Association (ANZBA) commenced the Bi-National Burns Registry (Bi-NBR) at that time. As a result of the limitations identified with the registry, ANZBA collaborated with Monash University to develop the registry as a clinical quality registry.

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417911000878

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.005

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2011.03.005

M3 - Article

SN - 0305-4179

VL - 38

SP - 52

EP - 60

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

IS - 1

ER -

Developing the first Bi-National clinical quality registry for burns - Lessons learned so far

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Improving the measurement of non-fatal injury burden - validating the GBD methods

NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship

Cite this

Developing the first Bi-National clinical quality registry for burns - Lessons learned so far

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Projects

Improving the measurement of non-fatal injury burden - validating the GBD methods

NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship

Cite this