慕课试验平台的研发: 一项用户研究的结果

Translated title of the contribution: Developing a MOOC experimentation platform: insights from a user study

Vitomir Kovanović, Michail Charalampos, Srecko Joksimović, George Siemens, Philip Katerinopoulos, Dragan Gašević

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

Abstract

In 2011, the phenomenon of MOOCs had swept the world of education and put online education in the focus of the public discourse around the world. Although researchers were excited with the vast amounts of MOOC data being collected, the benefits of this data did not stand to the expectations due to several challenges. The analyses of MOOC data are very time-consuming and labor-intensive, and require and require a highly advanced set of technical skills, often not available to the education researchers. Because of this MOOC data analyses are rarely done before the courses end, limiting the potential of data to impact the student learning outcomes and experience. In this paper we introduce MOOCito (MOOC intervention tool), a user-friendly software platform for the analysis of MOOC data, that focuses on conducting data-informed instructional interventions and course experimentations. We cover important design principles behind MOOCito and provide an overview of the trends in MOOC research leading to its development. Although a work-inprogress, in this paper, we outline the prototype of MOOCito and the results of a user evaluation study that focused on system's perceived usability and ease-of-use. The results of the study are discussed, as well as their practical implications.
Translated title of the contributionDeveloping a MOOC experimentation platform: insights from a user study
Original languageChinese
Pages (from-to)16-25
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Distance Education in China
Volume2017
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • A/B testing
  • Analysis platform
  • Controlled experiments
  • Coursera
  • MOOCs
  • Technology acceptance model
  • User study

Cite this