TY - JOUR
T1 - Determining the corticospinal, intracortical and motor function responses to transcranial alternating current stimulation of the motor cortex in healthy adults
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Rostami, Mohamad
AU - Lee, Annemarie
AU - Frazer, Ashlyn K.
AU - Akalu, Yonas
AU - Siddique, Ummatul
AU - Pearce, Alan J.
AU - Tallent, Jamie
AU - Kidgell, Dawson J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Mohamad Rostami, Ummatul Siddique and Yonas Akalu are supported by a Monash University Graduate Scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Background: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) employs low-intensity sinusoidal currents to influence cortical plasticity and motor function. Despite extensive research, inconsistent results require a comprehensive review of tACS efficacy. Objective: This study systematically assesses tACS effects on corticospinal and intracortical excitability, and motor function over the motor cortex (M1), focusing on alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies. Methods: Relevant studies were identified through database searches and citations were tracked until July 10, 2023. The methodological quality of the included studies (29) was evaluated by Downs and Black. Data synthesis involved meta-analysis (n = 25) and best evidence synthesis (n = 5). Results: Meta-analysis revealed that alpha and beta tACS with intensities > 1 mA and tACS with individualised alpha frequency (IAF) increased corticospinal excitability (CSE). tACS over M1 improved motor function, irrespective of stimulation frequency and intensity. Sub-analysis showed that alpha and beta tACS with an intensity ≤ 1 mA led to improved motor function, while gamma tACS at 2 mA enhanced motor function. Additionally, beta tACS at a fixed frequency of 20 Hz, as well as both low gamma (30–55) and high gamma (55–80) tACS, resulted in improved motor function. A stimulation duration of 20 min led to improvements in both CSE and motor function, and tACS with electrode sizes smaller than 35 cm2 and an electrode montage over M1-supraorbital region (SOR) were found to enhance motor function. Notably, both online and offline tACS improved motor function, regardless of stimulation factors. Conclusion: tACS modulates CSE and improves motor function, with outcomes dependent on stimulation parameters and timing.
AB - Background: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) employs low-intensity sinusoidal currents to influence cortical plasticity and motor function. Despite extensive research, inconsistent results require a comprehensive review of tACS efficacy. Objective: This study systematically assesses tACS effects on corticospinal and intracortical excitability, and motor function over the motor cortex (M1), focusing on alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies. Methods: Relevant studies were identified through database searches and citations were tracked until July 10, 2023. The methodological quality of the included studies (29) was evaluated by Downs and Black. Data synthesis involved meta-analysis (n = 25) and best evidence synthesis (n = 5). Results: Meta-analysis revealed that alpha and beta tACS with intensities > 1 mA and tACS with individualised alpha frequency (IAF) increased corticospinal excitability (CSE). tACS over M1 improved motor function, irrespective of stimulation frequency and intensity. Sub-analysis showed that alpha and beta tACS with an intensity ≤ 1 mA led to improved motor function, while gamma tACS at 2 mA enhanced motor function. Additionally, beta tACS at a fixed frequency of 20 Hz, as well as both low gamma (30–55) and high gamma (55–80) tACS, resulted in improved motor function. A stimulation duration of 20 min led to improvements in both CSE and motor function, and tACS with electrode sizes smaller than 35 cm2 and an electrode montage over M1-supraorbital region (SOR) were found to enhance motor function. Notably, both online and offline tACS improved motor function, regardless of stimulation factors. Conclusion: tACS modulates CSE and improves motor function, with outcomes dependent on stimulation parameters and timing.
KW - Alternating currents
KW - Cortical excitability
KW - Motor function
KW - Network modulation
KW - Transcranial stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175549798&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148650
DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148650
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175549798
SN - 0006-8993
VL - 1822
JO - Brain Research
JF - Brain Research
M1 - 148650
ER -