Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine optimum seat depth using subjective assessments. Comfort and discomfort evaluation, as an ergonomic subjective method, was used to find the optimum seat depth. A total of 36 university students rated the comfort and discomfort of six different seat depths (including 32.0, 37.0, 42.0, 47.0 and 52.0 cm which covered the buttock–popliteal length [BPL] range as well as 40.2 cm representing the 5th percentile of the BPL) during a 90-min period using a chair evaluation checklist. The results showed that a seat depth of 40.2 cm (equivalent to the 5th percentile of the BPL) was more comfortable and caused less discomfort ratings after 90 min compared to other experimental seat depths. The findings suggest that an appropriate seat depth for the studied population can be recommended based on the 5th percentile of the BPL as an anthropometric criterion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 429-435 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jul 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- anthropometric criteria
- seat design
- subjective methods
- university students
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver