Determinants of rural Australian primary health care worker retention: A synthesis of key evidence and implications for policymaking

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To synthesise key Australian empirical rural retention evidence and outline implications and potential applications for policymaking. Design: A comprehensive search of Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL plus, Scopus and EMBASE revealed eight peer-reviewed empirical studies published since 2000 quantifying factors associated with actual retention. Setting and participants: Rural and remote Australian primary health care workers. Main outcome measures: Hazard ratios (hazard of leaving rural), mean length of stay in current rural position and odds ratios (odds of leaving rural). Results: A broad range of geographical, professional, financial, educational, regulatory and personal factors are strongly and significantly associated with the rural retention of Australian primary health care workers. Important factors included geographical remoteness and population size, profession, providing hospital services, practising procedural skills, taking annual leave, employment grade, employment and payment structures, restricted access to provider numbers, country of training, vocational training, practitioner age group and cognitive behavioural coaching. These findings suggest that retention strategies should be multifaceted and 'bundled', addressing the combination of modifiable factors most important for specific groups of Australian rural and remote primary health care workers, and compensating health professionals for hardships they face that are linked to less modifiable factors. Conclusions: The short retention of many Australian rural and remote Allied Health Professionals and GPs, particularly in small, outer regional and remote communities, requires ongoing policy support. The important retention patterns highlighted in this review provide policymakers with direction about where to best target retention initiatives, as well as an indication of what they can do to improve retention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-14
Number of pages10
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Allied Health Personnel
  • General Practitioners
  • Health manpower
  • Health policy
  • Retention
  • Rural health services

Cite this

@article{ad3f626f5efb44b393d74e1a96b502af,
title = "Determinants of rural Australian primary health care worker retention: A synthesis of key evidence and implications for policymaking",
abstract = "Objective: To synthesise key Australian empirical rural retention evidence and outline implications and potential applications for policymaking. Design: A comprehensive search of Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL plus, Scopus and EMBASE revealed eight peer-reviewed empirical studies published since 2000 quantifying factors associated with actual retention. Setting and participants: Rural and remote Australian primary health care workers. Main outcome measures: Hazard ratios (hazard of leaving rural), mean length of stay in current rural position and odds ratios (odds of leaving rural). Results: A broad range of geographical, professional, financial, educational, regulatory and personal factors are strongly and significantly associated with the rural retention of Australian primary health care workers. Important factors included geographical remoteness and population size, profession, providing hospital services, practising procedural skills, taking annual leave, employment grade, employment and payment structures, restricted access to provider numbers, country of training, vocational training, practitioner age group and cognitive behavioural coaching. These findings suggest that retention strategies should be multifaceted and 'bundled', addressing the combination of modifiable factors most important for specific groups of Australian rural and remote primary health care workers, and compensating health professionals for hardships they face that are linked to less modifiable factors. Conclusions: The short retention of many Australian rural and remote Allied Health Professionals and GPs, particularly in small, outer regional and remote communities, requires ongoing policy support. The important retention patterns highlighted in this review provide policymakers with direction about where to best target retention initiatives, as well as an indication of what they can do to improve retention.",
keywords = "Allied Health Personnel, General Practitioners, Health manpower, Health policy, Retention, Rural health services",
author = "Russell, {Deborah J.} and McGrail, {Matthew R.} and Humphreys, {John S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/ajr.12294",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "5--14",
journal = "Australian Journal of Rural Health",
issn = "1038-5282",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of rural Australian primary health care worker retention

T2 - A synthesis of key evidence and implications for policymaking

AU - Russell, Deborah J.

AU - McGrail, Matthew R.

AU - Humphreys, John S.

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - Objective: To synthesise key Australian empirical rural retention evidence and outline implications and potential applications for policymaking. Design: A comprehensive search of Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL plus, Scopus and EMBASE revealed eight peer-reviewed empirical studies published since 2000 quantifying factors associated with actual retention. Setting and participants: Rural and remote Australian primary health care workers. Main outcome measures: Hazard ratios (hazard of leaving rural), mean length of stay in current rural position and odds ratios (odds of leaving rural). Results: A broad range of geographical, professional, financial, educational, regulatory and personal factors are strongly and significantly associated with the rural retention of Australian primary health care workers. Important factors included geographical remoteness and population size, profession, providing hospital services, practising procedural skills, taking annual leave, employment grade, employment and payment structures, restricted access to provider numbers, country of training, vocational training, practitioner age group and cognitive behavioural coaching. These findings suggest that retention strategies should be multifaceted and 'bundled', addressing the combination of modifiable factors most important for specific groups of Australian rural and remote primary health care workers, and compensating health professionals for hardships they face that are linked to less modifiable factors. Conclusions: The short retention of many Australian rural and remote Allied Health Professionals and GPs, particularly in small, outer regional and remote communities, requires ongoing policy support. The important retention patterns highlighted in this review provide policymakers with direction about where to best target retention initiatives, as well as an indication of what they can do to improve retention.

AB - Objective: To synthesise key Australian empirical rural retention evidence and outline implications and potential applications for policymaking. Design: A comprehensive search of Medline, PsychINFO, CINAHL plus, Scopus and EMBASE revealed eight peer-reviewed empirical studies published since 2000 quantifying factors associated with actual retention. Setting and participants: Rural and remote Australian primary health care workers. Main outcome measures: Hazard ratios (hazard of leaving rural), mean length of stay in current rural position and odds ratios (odds of leaving rural). Results: A broad range of geographical, professional, financial, educational, regulatory and personal factors are strongly and significantly associated with the rural retention of Australian primary health care workers. Important factors included geographical remoteness and population size, profession, providing hospital services, practising procedural skills, taking annual leave, employment grade, employment and payment structures, restricted access to provider numbers, country of training, vocational training, practitioner age group and cognitive behavioural coaching. These findings suggest that retention strategies should be multifaceted and 'bundled', addressing the combination of modifiable factors most important for specific groups of Australian rural and remote primary health care workers, and compensating health professionals for hardships they face that are linked to less modifiable factors. Conclusions: The short retention of many Australian rural and remote Allied Health Professionals and GPs, particularly in small, outer regional and remote communities, requires ongoing policy support. The important retention patterns highlighted in this review provide policymakers with direction about where to best target retention initiatives, as well as an indication of what they can do to improve retention.

KW - Allied Health Personnel

KW - General Practitioners

KW - Health manpower

KW - Health policy

KW - Retention

KW - Rural health services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963533721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajr.12294

DO - 10.1111/ajr.12294

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 5

EP - 14

JO - Australian Journal of Rural Health

JF - Australian Journal of Rural Health

SN - 1038-5282

IS - 1

ER -