Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

'Destroying' the pedagogical imaginary: implications of sexual difference for educational philosophy

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (Book)Otherpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter discusses teacher identity from a historical view, tracing the complexities of the gendering of teacher identities in western societies. It also investigates some of the antecedent conditions underlying the imputation of autonomy within conceptions of ‘teaching’ and ‘learning’. The chapter links the history of those concepts with the separate roles and functions assigned to males and females in specific instances of educational practice. ‘Teaching’ and ‘learning’ are psychoanalysed as images and symbols that have frequently been used in a neutral, asexuate sense. Dorothy Gardiner recounts the work of Margaret Vernon, a nun and educational administrator in sixteenth-century England. The images we hold of nuns as celibate serve phallic purposes as easily as do those of ‘whores’ as repositories of phallic desire. So long as female teachers were nuns, a semblance of sex-neutrality had been relatively easy to maintain, owing to the associations available between the clergy and chastity, celibacy, and so forth.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationFeminist Theory in Diverse Productive Practices
    Subtitle of host publicationAn Educational Philosophy and Theory Gender and Sexualities Reader
    EditorsLiz Jackson, Michael A. Peters
    Place of PublicationAbingdon UK
    PublisherTaylor & Francis
    Chapter7
    Pages117-135
    Number of pages19
    Volume6
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Electronic)9780429024146
    ISBN (Print)9780367109837
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Cite this