TY - JOUR
T1 - Dessaturação induzida pelo exercício em pacientes com bronquiectasia não fibrocística
T2 - Testes laboratoriais versus testes clínicos de campo
AU - de Oliveira, Cristiane Helga Yamane
AU - José, Anderson
AU - de Camargo, Anderson Alves
AU - Feltrim, Maria Ignez Zanetti
AU - Athanazio, Rodrigo Abensur
AU - Rached, Samia Zahi
AU - Stelmalch, Rafael
AU - Dal Corso, Simone
N1 - Funding Information:
Anderson José. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências de Reabilitação e Desempenho Físico-Funcional, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Avenida Eugênio do Nascimento, s/n, Dom Bosco, CEP 36038-330, Juiz de Fora (MG) Brasil. Tel.: 55 32 2102-3843. E-mail: [email protected] Apoio financeiro: Este estudo recebeu apoio financeiro da Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP; Processo n. 2014/01902-0). Anderson José recebeu bolsa da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES; Processo n. 1574873), e Simone Dal Corso recebeu bolsa do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; Processo n. 306531/2018-6). Recebido: 1 abril 2020.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objective: To investigate the validity of field walking tests to identify exercise-induced hypoxemia and to compare cardiorespiratory responses and perceived effort between laboratory-based and field-based exercise tests in subjects with bronchiectasis. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 72 non-oxygen-dependent participants (28 men; mean age = 48.3 ± 14.5 years; and mean FEV1 = 54.1 ± 23.4% of the predicted value). The participants underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a treadmill and constant work-rate exercise testing (CWRET) on the same day (1 h apart). In another visit, they underwent incremental shuttle walk testing (ISWT) and endurance shuttle walk testing (ESWT; 1 h apart). Desaturation was defined as a reduction in SpO2 ≥ 4% from rest to peak exercise. Results: CPET results were compared with ISWT results, as were CWRET results with ESWT results. There was no difference in the magnitude of desaturation between CPET and ISWT (−7.7 ± 6.3% vs. −6.6 ± 5.6%; p = 0.10) and between CWRET and ESWT (−6.8 ± 5.8% vs. −7.2 ± 6.3%; p = 0.50). The incremental tests showed an agreement in the magnitude of desaturation in the desaturation and no desaturation groups (42 and 14 participants, respectively; p < 0.01), as did the endurance tests (39 and 16 participants; p < 0.01). The magnitude of desaturation was similar among the participants who did or did not reach at least 85% of the maximum predicted HR. Conclusions: Field exercise tests showed good precision to detect desaturation. Field tests might be an alternative to laboratory tests when the clinical question is to investigate exercise-induced desaturation in subjects with bronchiectasis.
AB - Objective: To investigate the validity of field walking tests to identify exercise-induced hypoxemia and to compare cardiorespiratory responses and perceived effort between laboratory-based and field-based exercise tests in subjects with bronchiectasis. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 72 non-oxygen-dependent participants (28 men; mean age = 48.3 ± 14.5 years; and mean FEV1 = 54.1 ± 23.4% of the predicted value). The participants underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a treadmill and constant work-rate exercise testing (CWRET) on the same day (1 h apart). In another visit, they underwent incremental shuttle walk testing (ISWT) and endurance shuttle walk testing (ESWT; 1 h apart). Desaturation was defined as a reduction in SpO2 ≥ 4% from rest to peak exercise. Results: CPET results were compared with ISWT results, as were CWRET results with ESWT results. There was no difference in the magnitude of desaturation between CPET and ISWT (−7.7 ± 6.3% vs. −6.6 ± 5.6%; p = 0.10) and between CWRET and ESWT (−6.8 ± 5.8% vs. −7.2 ± 6.3%; p = 0.50). The incremental tests showed an agreement in the magnitude of desaturation in the desaturation and no desaturation groups (42 and 14 participants, respectively; p < 0.01), as did the endurance tests (39 and 16 participants; p < 0.01). The magnitude of desaturation was similar among the participants who did or did not reach at least 85% of the maximum predicted HR. Conclusions: Field exercise tests showed good precision to detect desaturation. Field tests might be an alternative to laboratory tests when the clinical question is to investigate exercise-induced desaturation in subjects with bronchiectasis.
KW - Bronchiectasis
KW - Exercise test
KW - Hypoxia
KW - Oxygen
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102332400&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200134
DO - 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200134
M3 - Article
C2 - 33656157
AN - SCOPUS:85102332400
SN - 1806-3713
VL - 47
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
JF - Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
IS - 2
M1 - e20200134
ER -