Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: Elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions

Elena B. Elkin, Susie H.M. Kim, Ephraim S. Casper, David W. Kissane, Deborah Schrag

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

231 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Shared decision making is a tenet of contemporary medicine and oncology practice. How involved elderly patients want to be in making treatment decisions and how physicians perceive patient preferences for such involvement are uncertain. Patients and Methods: In structured interviews about multiple facets of chemotherapy treatment decision making, we asked patients age 70 years and older with a recent diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) about their preferences for prognostic information and for involvement in treatment decision making. We also asked treating oncologists (n = 19) to describe their perceptions of patient preferences. Information and decision-making preferences were evaluated in relation to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Seventy-three patients age 70 to 89 years completed the study interview within 16 weeks of metastatic CRC diagnosis. Most patients (n = 70; 96%) had decided to receive chemotherapy and 61 had initiated treatment. Relatively few (n = 32; 44%) wanted information about expected survival when they made a treatment decision. Preference for prognostic information was more common among men than women (56% v 29%; P < .05). About half of the patients (n = 38; 52%) preferred a passive role in the treatment decision-making process. Physician perceptions were concordant with patient preferences for information in 44% of patient-physician pairs and for decision control in 41% of patient-physician pairs. Conclusion: For older patients with advanced CRC, preferences for prognostic information and for an active role in treatment decision making are not easily predictable. Physicians' perceptions are often inconsistent with patients' stated preferences. Explicit discussion of preferred decision-making styles may improve patient-physician encounters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5275-5280
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume25
Issue number33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2007

Cite this

Elkin, Elena B. ; Kim, Susie H.M. ; Casper, Ephraim S. ; Kissane, David W. ; Schrag, Deborah. / Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions : Elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions. In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007 ; Vol. 25, No. 33. pp. 5275-5280.
@article{fe1b80b0092c47749e2f1bb07bf66799,
title = "Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: Elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions",
abstract = "Purpose: Shared decision making is a tenet of contemporary medicine and oncology practice. How involved elderly patients want to be in making treatment decisions and how physicians perceive patient preferences for such involvement are uncertain. Patients and Methods: In structured interviews about multiple facets of chemotherapy treatment decision making, we asked patients age 70 years and older with a recent diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) about their preferences for prognostic information and for involvement in treatment decision making. We also asked treating oncologists (n = 19) to describe their perceptions of patient preferences. Information and decision-making preferences were evaluated in relation to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Seventy-three patients age 70 to 89 years completed the study interview within 16 weeks of metastatic CRC diagnosis. Most patients (n = 70; 96{\%}) had decided to receive chemotherapy and 61 had initiated treatment. Relatively few (n = 32; 44{\%}) wanted information about expected survival when they made a treatment decision. Preference for prognostic information was more common among men than women (56{\%} v 29{\%}; P < .05). About half of the patients (n = 38; 52{\%}) preferred a passive role in the treatment decision-making process. Physician perceptions were concordant with patient preferences for information in 44{\%} of patient-physician pairs and for decision control in 41{\%} of patient-physician pairs. Conclusion: For older patients with advanced CRC, preferences for prognostic information and for an active role in treatment decision making are not easily predictable. Physicians' perceptions are often inconsistent with patients' stated preferences. Explicit discussion of preferred decision-making styles may improve patient-physician encounters.",
author = "Elkin, {Elena B.} and Kim, {Susie H.M.} and Casper, {Ephraim S.} and Kissane, {David W.} and Deborah Schrag",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "5275--5280",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY",
number = "33",

}

Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions : Elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions. / Elkin, Elena B.; Kim, Susie H.M.; Casper, Ephraim S.; Kissane, David W.; Schrag, Deborah.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 25, No. 33, 20.11.2007, p. 5275-5280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions

T2 - Elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions

AU - Elkin, Elena B.

AU - Kim, Susie H.M.

AU - Casper, Ephraim S.

AU - Kissane, David W.

AU - Schrag, Deborah

PY - 2007/11/20

Y1 - 2007/11/20

N2 - Purpose: Shared decision making is a tenet of contemporary medicine and oncology practice. How involved elderly patients want to be in making treatment decisions and how physicians perceive patient preferences for such involvement are uncertain. Patients and Methods: In structured interviews about multiple facets of chemotherapy treatment decision making, we asked patients age 70 years and older with a recent diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) about their preferences for prognostic information and for involvement in treatment decision making. We also asked treating oncologists (n = 19) to describe their perceptions of patient preferences. Information and decision-making preferences were evaluated in relation to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Seventy-three patients age 70 to 89 years completed the study interview within 16 weeks of metastatic CRC diagnosis. Most patients (n = 70; 96%) had decided to receive chemotherapy and 61 had initiated treatment. Relatively few (n = 32; 44%) wanted information about expected survival when they made a treatment decision. Preference for prognostic information was more common among men than women (56% v 29%; P < .05). About half of the patients (n = 38; 52%) preferred a passive role in the treatment decision-making process. Physician perceptions were concordant with patient preferences for information in 44% of patient-physician pairs and for decision control in 41% of patient-physician pairs. Conclusion: For older patients with advanced CRC, preferences for prognostic information and for an active role in treatment decision making are not easily predictable. Physicians' perceptions are often inconsistent with patients' stated preferences. Explicit discussion of preferred decision-making styles may improve patient-physician encounters.

AB - Purpose: Shared decision making is a tenet of contemporary medicine and oncology practice. How involved elderly patients want to be in making treatment decisions and how physicians perceive patient preferences for such involvement are uncertain. Patients and Methods: In structured interviews about multiple facets of chemotherapy treatment decision making, we asked patients age 70 years and older with a recent diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) about their preferences for prognostic information and for involvement in treatment decision making. We also asked treating oncologists (n = 19) to describe their perceptions of patient preferences. Information and decision-making preferences were evaluated in relation to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Seventy-three patients age 70 to 89 years completed the study interview within 16 weeks of metastatic CRC diagnosis. Most patients (n = 70; 96%) had decided to receive chemotherapy and 61 had initiated treatment. Relatively few (n = 32; 44%) wanted information about expected survival when they made a treatment decision. Preference for prognostic information was more common among men than women (56% v 29%; P < .05). About half of the patients (n = 38; 52%) preferred a passive role in the treatment decision-making process. Physician perceptions were concordant with patient preferences for information in 44% of patient-physician pairs and for decision control in 41% of patient-physician pairs. Conclusion: For older patients with advanced CRC, preferences for prognostic information and for an active role in treatment decision making are not easily predictable. Physicians' perceptions are often inconsistent with patients' stated preferences. Explicit discussion of preferred decision-making styles may improve patient-physician encounters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36849087805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922

DO - 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922

M3 - Article

C2 - 18024875

AN - SCOPUS:36849087805

VL - 25

SP - 5275

EP - 5280

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 33

ER -