Abstract
This article examines the implications of automation for administrative law, with a focus on the question of whether an automated decision is a ‘decision’ for the purpose of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth). In doing so, the paper uses the recent decision of the Full Federal Court decision of Pintarich v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCAFC 79 as a case study to illustrate some of the broader issues posed by automation for administrative law doctrine. In examining the implications of automation, we argue that there must be a flexible, modern interpretation of existing administrative law principles or the development of innovative new principles to address these technological developments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 21-34 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Administrative Law |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Automation
- Administrative Law
- Decision
- Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act
- Deliberation
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver