Defining the upper extremity range of motion for safe automobile driving

Aziz Rawal, Ash Chehata, Tim Horberry, Matthew Shumack, Chao Chen, Luke Bonato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: There are no guidelines for return to driving following upper extremity injury. A greater comprehension of the role of the upper extremity in driving is required to assist clinicians in their fitness-to-drive assessments. This research aims to assist clinicians by analyzing the motion at the upper extremity in safe automobile driving. Methods: Thirty-six participants were recruited to the Monash University Accident Research Centre's driving simulator. They were tested in a realistic driving simulation using highway scenarios and traffic hazards. An OptiTrack™ motion tracking system recorded participants’ upper limb movements. Findings: The following ranges of motion were recorded (left and right arm mean whole numbers): The shoulder flexed from 14 to 54° abducted to 18°and adducted to 9°. Shoulder rotation ranged from 6° external to 32° internal rotation. Elbow flexion ranged from 35° to 72°. Pronation reached 77° and supination to 24°. Wrist flexion reached 34° and extension reached 23°. The wrist deviated to 17°radially and 38° ulnar. To avoid simulated hazards, the steering wheel revolved 57.2° (SD 19.2). The key movements in hazard avoidance are shoulder flexion, shoulder rotation, forearm rotation and wrist deviation. Interpretation: Shoulder flexion, internal rotation and forearm rotation have been shown to be key upper extremity movements in safe driving. Clinicians can refer to the ranges of motion recorded in this investigation, or the driving task at hand in their fitness-to-drive assessments. The ability to revolve the steering wheel 100° exceeds the 95th percentile of the steering wheel revolution angle required to avoid simulated traffic hazards.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-85
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Driving
  • Orthopaedics
  • Range of motion
  • Steering
  • Upper extremity

Cite this

Rawal, Aziz ; Chehata, Ash ; Horberry, Tim ; Shumack, Matthew ; Chen, Chao ; Bonato, Luke. / Defining the upper extremity range of motion for safe automobile driving. In: Clinical Biomechanics. 2018 ; Vol. 54. pp. 78-85.
@article{63e11dd1c6174aaf9bee84a53584e262,
title = "Defining the upper extremity range of motion for safe automobile driving",
abstract = "Background: There are no guidelines for return to driving following upper extremity injury. A greater comprehension of the role of the upper extremity in driving is required to assist clinicians in their fitness-to-drive assessments. This research aims to assist clinicians by analyzing the motion at the upper extremity in safe automobile driving. Methods: Thirty-six participants were recruited to the Monash University Accident Research Centre's driving simulator. They were tested in a realistic driving simulation using highway scenarios and traffic hazards. An OptiTrack™ motion tracking system recorded participants’ upper limb movements. Findings: The following ranges of motion were recorded (left and right arm mean whole numbers): The shoulder flexed from 14 to 54° abducted to 18°and adducted to 9°. Shoulder rotation ranged from 6° external to 32° internal rotation. Elbow flexion ranged from 35° to 72°. Pronation reached 77° and supination to 24°. Wrist flexion reached 34° and extension reached 23°. The wrist deviated to 17°radially and 38° ulnar. To avoid simulated hazards, the steering wheel revolved 57.2° (SD 19.2). The key movements in hazard avoidance are shoulder flexion, shoulder rotation, forearm rotation and wrist deviation. Interpretation: Shoulder flexion, internal rotation and forearm rotation have been shown to be key upper extremity movements in safe driving. Clinicians can refer to the ranges of motion recorded in this investigation, or the driving task at hand in their fitness-to-drive assessments. The ability to revolve the steering wheel 100° exceeds the 95th percentile of the steering wheel revolution angle required to avoid simulated traffic hazards.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Driving, Orthopaedics, Range of motion, Steering, Upper extremity",
author = "Aziz Rawal and Ash Chehata and Tim Horberry and Matthew Shumack and Chao Chen and Luke Bonato",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.009",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "78--85",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Defining the upper extremity range of motion for safe automobile driving. / Rawal, Aziz; Chehata, Ash; Horberry, Tim; Shumack, Matthew; Chen, Chao; Bonato, Luke.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, Vol. 54, 01.05.2018, p. 78-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining the upper extremity range of motion for safe automobile driving

AU - Rawal, Aziz

AU - Chehata, Ash

AU - Horberry, Tim

AU - Shumack, Matthew

AU - Chen, Chao

AU - Bonato, Luke

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Background: There are no guidelines for return to driving following upper extremity injury. A greater comprehension of the role of the upper extremity in driving is required to assist clinicians in their fitness-to-drive assessments. This research aims to assist clinicians by analyzing the motion at the upper extremity in safe automobile driving. Methods: Thirty-six participants were recruited to the Monash University Accident Research Centre's driving simulator. They were tested in a realistic driving simulation using highway scenarios and traffic hazards. An OptiTrack™ motion tracking system recorded participants’ upper limb movements. Findings: The following ranges of motion were recorded (left and right arm mean whole numbers): The shoulder flexed from 14 to 54° abducted to 18°and adducted to 9°. Shoulder rotation ranged from 6° external to 32° internal rotation. Elbow flexion ranged from 35° to 72°. Pronation reached 77° and supination to 24°. Wrist flexion reached 34° and extension reached 23°. The wrist deviated to 17°radially and 38° ulnar. To avoid simulated hazards, the steering wheel revolved 57.2° (SD 19.2). The key movements in hazard avoidance are shoulder flexion, shoulder rotation, forearm rotation and wrist deviation. Interpretation: Shoulder flexion, internal rotation and forearm rotation have been shown to be key upper extremity movements in safe driving. Clinicians can refer to the ranges of motion recorded in this investigation, or the driving task at hand in their fitness-to-drive assessments. The ability to revolve the steering wheel 100° exceeds the 95th percentile of the steering wheel revolution angle required to avoid simulated traffic hazards.

AB - Background: There are no guidelines for return to driving following upper extremity injury. A greater comprehension of the role of the upper extremity in driving is required to assist clinicians in their fitness-to-drive assessments. This research aims to assist clinicians by analyzing the motion at the upper extremity in safe automobile driving. Methods: Thirty-six participants were recruited to the Monash University Accident Research Centre's driving simulator. They were tested in a realistic driving simulation using highway scenarios and traffic hazards. An OptiTrack™ motion tracking system recorded participants’ upper limb movements. Findings: The following ranges of motion were recorded (left and right arm mean whole numbers): The shoulder flexed from 14 to 54° abducted to 18°and adducted to 9°. Shoulder rotation ranged from 6° external to 32° internal rotation. Elbow flexion ranged from 35° to 72°. Pronation reached 77° and supination to 24°. Wrist flexion reached 34° and extension reached 23°. The wrist deviated to 17°radially and 38° ulnar. To avoid simulated hazards, the steering wheel revolved 57.2° (SD 19.2). The key movements in hazard avoidance are shoulder flexion, shoulder rotation, forearm rotation and wrist deviation. Interpretation: Shoulder flexion, internal rotation and forearm rotation have been shown to be key upper extremity movements in safe driving. Clinicians can refer to the ranges of motion recorded in this investigation, or the driving task at hand in their fitness-to-drive assessments. The ability to revolve the steering wheel 100° exceeds the 95th percentile of the steering wheel revolution angle required to avoid simulated traffic hazards.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Driving

KW - Orthopaedics

KW - Range of motion

KW - Steering

KW - Upper extremity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044104872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.009

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 78

EP - 85

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

ER -