Defining fluid removal in the intensive care unit: A national and international survey of critical care practice

Michael E O'Connor, Sarah L Jones, Neil J Glassford, Rinaldo Bellomo, John R Prowle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Design and objectives: To identify and compare how intensive care unit specialists in the United Kingdom and Australia and New Zealand self-reportedly define, assess and manage fluid overload in critically ill patients using a structured online questionnaire. Results: We assessed 219 responses. Australia and New Zealand and United Kingdom intensive care unit specialists reported using clinical examination findings, bedside tools and radiological features to assess fluid status, diagnose fluid overload and initiate fluid removal in the critically ill. An elevated central venous pressure is not regarded as helpful in diagnosing fluid overload and targeting a clinician-set fluid balance is the most popular management strategy. Renal replacement therapy is used ahead of more diuretic therapy in patients who are oligo/anuric, or when diuretic therapy has not generated an adequate response. Conclusions: This self-reported account of practice by United Kingdom and Australia and New Zealand intensivists demonstrates that fluid overload remains poorly defined with variability in both management and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-288
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Intensive Care Society
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • assessment
  • critical care
  • Fluid overload
  • fluid removal
  • renal replacement therapy

Cite this