Deceptive journalism

characteristics of untrustworthy news items

Charlotte Govaert, Luuk Lagerwerf, Céline Klemm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Trustworthiness is key in journalism, yet some journalists intentionally deceive their audiences by fabricating sources or inventing news stories altogether. Earlier research suggests that deceitful news articles have characteristics that are different from trustworthy news articles. We aimed to confirm and expand on the existing literature by examining the case of Perdiep Ramesar, an esteemed Dutch journalist until it was discovered in 2014 that sources were non-existing in 126 of his articles for national newspaper Trouw (“Fidelity”). Using content analysis, we searched for systematic differences in source use and presentation comparing Ramesar’s deceptive news articles with two same-sized sets of reliable articles, (1) articles on similar topics from other journalists and (2) articles with verifiable sources from Ramesar himself. Results indicate that compared to real news sources, fictitious sources are more often secondary definers, who are presented in more stereotypical ways and through more and longer direct quotations. Furthermore, negations and self-references occur more often in deceptive news articles.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages17
JournalJournalism Practice
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • deceptive journalism
  • source fabrication
  • source presentation
  • stereotyping

Cite this

@article{e7f4fe46a1814b83a10f3bc3a33573e6,
title = "Deceptive journalism: characteristics of untrustworthy news items",
abstract = "Trustworthiness is key in journalism, yet some journalists intentionally deceive their audiences by fabricating sources or inventing news stories altogether. Earlier research suggests that deceitful news articles have characteristics that are different from trustworthy news articles. We aimed to confirm and expand on the existing literature by examining the case of Perdiep Ramesar, an esteemed Dutch journalist until it was discovered in 2014 that sources were non-existing in 126 of his articles for national newspaper Trouw (“Fidelity”). Using content analysis, we searched for systematic differences in source use and presentation comparing Ramesar’s deceptive news articles with two same-sized sets of reliable articles, (1) articles on similar topics from other journalists and (2) articles with verifiable sources from Ramesar himself. Results indicate that compared to real news sources, fictitious sources are more often secondary definers, who are presented in more stereotypical ways and through more and longer direct quotations. Furthermore, negations and self-references occur more often in deceptive news articles.",
keywords = "deceptive journalism, source fabrication, source presentation, stereotyping",
author = "Charlotte Govaert and Luuk Lagerwerf and C{\'e}line Klemm",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/17512786.2019.1637768",
language = "English",
journal = "Journalism Practice",
issn = "1751-2786",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Deceptive journalism : characteristics of untrustworthy news items. / Govaert, Charlotte; Lagerwerf, Luuk; Klemm, Céline.

In: Journalism Practice, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deceptive journalism

T2 - characteristics of untrustworthy news items

AU - Govaert, Charlotte

AU - Lagerwerf, Luuk

AU - Klemm, Céline

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Trustworthiness is key in journalism, yet some journalists intentionally deceive their audiences by fabricating sources or inventing news stories altogether. Earlier research suggests that deceitful news articles have characteristics that are different from trustworthy news articles. We aimed to confirm and expand on the existing literature by examining the case of Perdiep Ramesar, an esteemed Dutch journalist until it was discovered in 2014 that sources were non-existing in 126 of his articles for national newspaper Trouw (“Fidelity”). Using content analysis, we searched for systematic differences in source use and presentation comparing Ramesar’s deceptive news articles with two same-sized sets of reliable articles, (1) articles on similar topics from other journalists and (2) articles with verifiable sources from Ramesar himself. Results indicate that compared to real news sources, fictitious sources are more often secondary definers, who are presented in more stereotypical ways and through more and longer direct quotations. Furthermore, negations and self-references occur more often in deceptive news articles.

AB - Trustworthiness is key in journalism, yet some journalists intentionally deceive their audiences by fabricating sources or inventing news stories altogether. Earlier research suggests that deceitful news articles have characteristics that are different from trustworthy news articles. We aimed to confirm and expand on the existing literature by examining the case of Perdiep Ramesar, an esteemed Dutch journalist until it was discovered in 2014 that sources were non-existing in 126 of his articles for national newspaper Trouw (“Fidelity”). Using content analysis, we searched for systematic differences in source use and presentation comparing Ramesar’s deceptive news articles with two same-sized sets of reliable articles, (1) articles on similar topics from other journalists and (2) articles with verifiable sources from Ramesar himself. Results indicate that compared to real news sources, fictitious sources are more often secondary definers, who are presented in more stereotypical ways and through more and longer direct quotations. Furthermore, negations and self-references occur more often in deceptive news articles.

KW - deceptive journalism

KW - source fabrication

KW - source presentation

KW - stereotyping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070308444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17512786.2019.1637768

DO - 10.1080/17512786.2019.1637768

M3 - Article

JO - Journalism Practice

JF - Journalism Practice

SN - 1751-2786

ER -