Dead DOGS? Towards a less restrictive interpretation of the establishment clause: Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc v Liverpool City Council (No 2)

Luke Beck

Dead DOGS? Towards a less restrictive interpretation of the establishment clause: Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc v Liverpool City Council (No 2)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	59-73
Number of pages	15
Journal	University of Western Australia Law Review
Volume	37
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - 2014
Externally published	Yes

Cite this

@article{cf708c0a77c3484b9f0af6d60ddf2e3c,

title = "Dead DOGS? Towards a less restrictive interpretation of the establishment clause: Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc v Liverpool City Council (No 2)",

author = "Luke Beck",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

volume = "37",

pages = "59--73",

journal = "University of Western Australia Law Review",

issn = "0042-0328",

number = "2",

}