Cue-utilisation typologies and pilots' pre-flight and in-flight weather decision-making

Mark W. Wiggins, Danielle Azar, Jake Hawken, Thomas Loveday, David Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In complex, high consequence environments such as aviation, the capacity to acquire, integrate, and respond to task-related cues is critical for accurate situation assessment and to avoid plan-continuation errors. The aim of the present study was to establish whether differences in performance on a series of aviation-related, cue-based tasks corresponded to differences in decision selection during simulated pre-flight and in-flight weather-related decision-making. In Phase 1 (pre-flight decisions), 57 participants were categorised into one of two typologies based on their performance on the cue-based tasks. These typologies reflected behaviour that was consistent with relatively greater or lesser levels of cue utilisation, and corresponded to whether the pilots elected to make an immediate decision or wait for additional information during a simulated pre-flight decision task. In Phase 2, a cohort of 20 pilots was selected on the basis that they represented one of the two cue-based typologies established in Phase 1. They undertook a simulated flight during which the weather conditions deteriorated progressively en-route. Those pilots who demonstrated a relatively greater level of cue utilisation were more likely to continue the flight as planned, while those pilots who demonstrated a relatively lesser level of cue utilisation were more likely to descend or divert from the planned track. The implications are discussed in terms of targeted training and explanations of plan-continuation errors in the context of weather-related decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-124
Number of pages7
JournalSafety Science
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cues
  • Plan-continuation errors
  • Situation assessment
  • Weather-related decision-making

Cite this

Wiggins, Mark W. ; Azar, Danielle ; Hawken, Jake ; Loveday, Thomas ; Newman, David. / Cue-utilisation typologies and pilots' pre-flight and in-flight weather decision-making. In: Safety Science. 2014 ; Vol. 65. pp. 118-124.
@article{9aca70e9a3164f8390c0d89b8565ce3c,
title = "Cue-utilisation typologies and pilots' pre-flight and in-flight weather decision-making",
abstract = "In complex, high consequence environments such as aviation, the capacity to acquire, integrate, and respond to task-related cues is critical for accurate situation assessment and to avoid plan-continuation errors. The aim of the present study was to establish whether differences in performance on a series of aviation-related, cue-based tasks corresponded to differences in decision selection during simulated pre-flight and in-flight weather-related decision-making. In Phase 1 (pre-flight decisions), 57 participants were categorised into one of two typologies based on their performance on the cue-based tasks. These typologies reflected behaviour that was consistent with relatively greater or lesser levels of cue utilisation, and corresponded to whether the pilots elected to make an immediate decision or wait for additional information during a simulated pre-flight decision task. In Phase 2, a cohort of 20 pilots was selected on the basis that they represented one of the two cue-based typologies established in Phase 1. They undertook a simulated flight during which the weather conditions deteriorated progressively en-route. Those pilots who demonstrated a relatively greater level of cue utilisation were more likely to continue the flight as planned, while those pilots who demonstrated a relatively lesser level of cue utilisation were more likely to descend or divert from the planned track. The implications are discussed in terms of targeted training and explanations of plan-continuation errors in the context of weather-related decision-making.",
keywords = "Cues, Plan-continuation errors, Situation assessment, Weather-related decision-making",
author = "Wiggins, {Mark W.} and Danielle Azar and Jake Hawken and Thomas Loveday and David Newman",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2014.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "118--124",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Cue-utilisation typologies and pilots' pre-flight and in-flight weather decision-making. / Wiggins, Mark W.; Azar, Danielle; Hawken, Jake; Loveday, Thomas; Newman, David.

In: Safety Science, Vol. 65, 06.2014, p. 118-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cue-utilisation typologies and pilots' pre-flight and in-flight weather decision-making

AU - Wiggins, Mark W.

AU - Azar, Danielle

AU - Hawken, Jake

AU - Loveday, Thomas

AU - Newman, David

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - In complex, high consequence environments such as aviation, the capacity to acquire, integrate, and respond to task-related cues is critical for accurate situation assessment and to avoid plan-continuation errors. The aim of the present study was to establish whether differences in performance on a series of aviation-related, cue-based tasks corresponded to differences in decision selection during simulated pre-flight and in-flight weather-related decision-making. In Phase 1 (pre-flight decisions), 57 participants were categorised into one of two typologies based on their performance on the cue-based tasks. These typologies reflected behaviour that was consistent with relatively greater or lesser levels of cue utilisation, and corresponded to whether the pilots elected to make an immediate decision or wait for additional information during a simulated pre-flight decision task. In Phase 2, a cohort of 20 pilots was selected on the basis that they represented one of the two cue-based typologies established in Phase 1. They undertook a simulated flight during which the weather conditions deteriorated progressively en-route. Those pilots who demonstrated a relatively greater level of cue utilisation were more likely to continue the flight as planned, while those pilots who demonstrated a relatively lesser level of cue utilisation were more likely to descend or divert from the planned track. The implications are discussed in terms of targeted training and explanations of plan-continuation errors in the context of weather-related decision-making.

AB - In complex, high consequence environments such as aviation, the capacity to acquire, integrate, and respond to task-related cues is critical for accurate situation assessment and to avoid plan-continuation errors. The aim of the present study was to establish whether differences in performance on a series of aviation-related, cue-based tasks corresponded to differences in decision selection during simulated pre-flight and in-flight weather-related decision-making. In Phase 1 (pre-flight decisions), 57 participants were categorised into one of two typologies based on their performance on the cue-based tasks. These typologies reflected behaviour that was consistent with relatively greater or lesser levels of cue utilisation, and corresponded to whether the pilots elected to make an immediate decision or wait for additional information during a simulated pre-flight decision task. In Phase 2, a cohort of 20 pilots was selected on the basis that they represented one of the two cue-based typologies established in Phase 1. They undertook a simulated flight during which the weather conditions deteriorated progressively en-route. Those pilots who demonstrated a relatively greater level of cue utilisation were more likely to continue the flight as planned, while those pilots who demonstrated a relatively lesser level of cue utilisation were more likely to descend or divert from the planned track. The implications are discussed in terms of targeted training and explanations of plan-continuation errors in the context of weather-related decision-making.

KW - Cues

KW - Plan-continuation errors

KW - Situation assessment

KW - Weather-related decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896720178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 118

EP - 124

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

ER -