Critical Issues That Need to Be Addressed to Improve Outcomes for Patients with Carotid Stenosis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Significant improvement in outcomes for patients with carotid stenosis requires liberation from the historic fixation with randomization and a procedurally based, late-stage, reactive approach to medical care. We require a multipronged and multidisciplinary approach that includes all of the following: (i) removal of overreliance on, and biased use of, randomized trial data; (ii) using accurate ways to rank evidence quality and relevance; (iii) improved research reporting standards; (iv) building quality assurance and other research capability into routine practice; (v) producing evidence-true rather than evidence-based guidelines; (vi) bringing current optimal medical treatment to the community and measuring its effectiveness; (vii) funding only interventions known to help patients when and where they are treated and use the savings to fund vital research, including quality assurance in routine practice; and (viii) recognize that making the indication for carotid procedures obsolete is a good thing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)420-426
Number of pages7
JournalAngiology
Volume67
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • carotid angioplasty/stenting
  • carotid endarterectomy
  • carotid stenosis
  • guidelines
  • quality assurance
  • stroke prevention

Cite this

@article{755d759f6d2e4cbea7f12ca50b465be6,
title = "Critical Issues That Need to Be Addressed to Improve Outcomes for Patients with Carotid Stenosis",
abstract = "Significant improvement in outcomes for patients with carotid stenosis requires liberation from the historic fixation with randomization and a procedurally based, late-stage, reactive approach to medical care. We require a multipronged and multidisciplinary approach that includes all of the following: (i) removal of overreliance on, and biased use of, randomized trial data; (ii) using accurate ways to rank evidence quality and relevance; (iii) improved research reporting standards; (iv) building quality assurance and other research capability into routine practice; (v) producing evidence-true rather than evidence-based guidelines; (vi) bringing current optimal medical treatment to the community and measuring its effectiveness; (vii) funding only interventions known to help patients when and where they are treated and use the savings to fund vital research, including quality assurance in routine practice; and (viii) recognize that making the indication for carotid procedures obsolete is a good thing.",
keywords = "carotid angioplasty/stenting, carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenosis, guidelines, quality assurance, stroke prevention",
author = "Anne Abbott",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/0003319716631266",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "420--426",
journal = "Angiology",
issn = "0003-3197",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Critical Issues That Need to Be Addressed to Improve Outcomes for Patients with Carotid Stenosis. / Abbott, Anne.

In: Angiology, Vol. 67, No. 5, 2016, p. 420-426.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical Issues That Need to Be Addressed to Improve Outcomes for Patients with Carotid Stenosis

AU - Abbott, Anne

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Significant improvement in outcomes for patients with carotid stenosis requires liberation from the historic fixation with randomization and a procedurally based, late-stage, reactive approach to medical care. We require a multipronged and multidisciplinary approach that includes all of the following: (i) removal of overreliance on, and biased use of, randomized trial data; (ii) using accurate ways to rank evidence quality and relevance; (iii) improved research reporting standards; (iv) building quality assurance and other research capability into routine practice; (v) producing evidence-true rather than evidence-based guidelines; (vi) bringing current optimal medical treatment to the community and measuring its effectiveness; (vii) funding only interventions known to help patients when and where they are treated and use the savings to fund vital research, including quality assurance in routine practice; and (viii) recognize that making the indication for carotid procedures obsolete is a good thing.

AB - Significant improvement in outcomes for patients with carotid stenosis requires liberation from the historic fixation with randomization and a procedurally based, late-stage, reactive approach to medical care. We require a multipronged and multidisciplinary approach that includes all of the following: (i) removal of overreliance on, and biased use of, randomized trial data; (ii) using accurate ways to rank evidence quality and relevance; (iii) improved research reporting standards; (iv) building quality assurance and other research capability into routine practice; (v) producing evidence-true rather than evidence-based guidelines; (vi) bringing current optimal medical treatment to the community and measuring its effectiveness; (vii) funding only interventions known to help patients when and where they are treated and use the savings to fund vital research, including quality assurance in routine practice; and (viii) recognize that making the indication for carotid procedures obsolete is a good thing.

KW - carotid angioplasty/stenting

KW - carotid endarterectomy

KW - carotid stenosis

KW - guidelines

KW - quality assurance

KW - stroke prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963739053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0003319716631266

DO - 10.1177/0003319716631266

M3 - Review Article

VL - 67

SP - 420

EP - 426

JO - Angiology

JF - Angiology

SN - 0003-3197

IS - 5

ER -