Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: a Scientometric analysis

M. Reza Hosseini, Igor Martek, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Ajibade A. Aibinu, Mehrdad Arashpour, Nicholas Chileshe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Practical interest in ‘off-site construction’ has risen remarkably over the last decade, and with it there has been a burgeoning of academic research in the field. Complementing this research, a number of literature reviews have been conducted. None, however, are systematic. This study addresses this lack, offering the first bibliometric study to explore the state of off-site construction research (OCR). A quantitative approach using ‘science mapping’ techniques is employed to examine 501 top-ranked construction journal articles. Longitudinal trends in publishing are identified, as are dominant research sub-fields, their connectedness with other areas of study, as well as citation patterns, publication journal areas of focus, key research institutions, key research persons, along with the extent to which these interact with each other in research networks. The findings are instructive in identifying the deficiencies in current research. Among these is a bias towards product research over operations and management, and a sharp compartmentalization of sub-fields, with little or no cross-fertilization between researcher areas, the researchers themselves, nor the research institutions. Clearly, this awareness will inform industry, journal editors and researchers of the need for a deeper exchange of ideas in any future research efforts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-247
Number of pages13
JournalAutomation in Construction
Volume87
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Hosseini, M. Reza ; Martek, Igor ; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ; Aibinu, Ajibade A. ; Arashpour, Mehrdad ; Chileshe, Nicholas. / Critical evaluation of off-site construction research : a Scientometric analysis. In: Automation in Construction. 2018 ; Vol. 87. pp. 235-247.
@article{6d75d5354e8d46dcb7bb85123b821fbc,
title = "Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: a Scientometric analysis",
abstract = "Practical interest in ‘off-site construction’ has risen remarkably over the last decade, and with it there has been a burgeoning of academic research in the field. Complementing this research, a number of literature reviews have been conducted. None, however, are systematic. This study addresses this lack, offering the first bibliometric study to explore the state of off-site construction research (OCR). A quantitative approach using ‘science mapping’ techniques is employed to examine 501 top-ranked construction journal articles. Longitudinal trends in publishing are identified, as are dominant research sub-fields, their connectedness with other areas of study, as well as citation patterns, publication journal areas of focus, key research institutions, key research persons, along with the extent to which these interact with each other in research networks. The findings are instructive in identifying the deficiencies in current research. Among these is a bias towards product research over operations and management, and a sharp compartmentalization of sub-fields, with little or no cross-fertilization between researcher areas, the researchers themselves, nor the research institutions. Clearly, this awareness will inform industry, journal editors and researchers of the need for a deeper exchange of ideas in any future research efforts.",
author = "Hosseini, {M. Reza} and Igor Martek and Zavadskas, {Edmundas Kazimieras} and Aibinu, {Ajibade A.} and Mehrdad Arashpour and Nicholas Chileshe",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "235--247",
journal = "Automation in Construction",
issn = "0926-5805",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Critical evaluation of off-site construction research : a Scientometric analysis. / Hosseini, M. Reza; Martek, Igor; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras; Aibinu, Ajibade A.; Arashpour, Mehrdad; Chileshe, Nicholas.

In: Automation in Construction, Vol. 87, 01.03.2018, p. 235-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical evaluation of off-site construction research

T2 - a Scientometric analysis

AU - Hosseini, M. Reza

AU - Martek, Igor

AU - Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras

AU - Aibinu, Ajibade A.

AU - Arashpour, Mehrdad

AU - Chileshe, Nicholas

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Practical interest in ‘off-site construction’ has risen remarkably over the last decade, and with it there has been a burgeoning of academic research in the field. Complementing this research, a number of literature reviews have been conducted. None, however, are systematic. This study addresses this lack, offering the first bibliometric study to explore the state of off-site construction research (OCR). A quantitative approach using ‘science mapping’ techniques is employed to examine 501 top-ranked construction journal articles. Longitudinal trends in publishing are identified, as are dominant research sub-fields, their connectedness with other areas of study, as well as citation patterns, publication journal areas of focus, key research institutions, key research persons, along with the extent to which these interact with each other in research networks. The findings are instructive in identifying the deficiencies in current research. Among these is a bias towards product research over operations and management, and a sharp compartmentalization of sub-fields, with little or no cross-fertilization between researcher areas, the researchers themselves, nor the research institutions. Clearly, this awareness will inform industry, journal editors and researchers of the need for a deeper exchange of ideas in any future research efforts.

AB - Practical interest in ‘off-site construction’ has risen remarkably over the last decade, and with it there has been a burgeoning of academic research in the field. Complementing this research, a number of literature reviews have been conducted. None, however, are systematic. This study addresses this lack, offering the first bibliometric study to explore the state of off-site construction research (OCR). A quantitative approach using ‘science mapping’ techniques is employed to examine 501 top-ranked construction journal articles. Longitudinal trends in publishing are identified, as are dominant research sub-fields, their connectedness with other areas of study, as well as citation patterns, publication journal areas of focus, key research institutions, key research persons, along with the extent to which these interact with each other in research networks. The findings are instructive in identifying the deficiencies in current research. Among these is a bias towards product research over operations and management, and a sharp compartmentalization of sub-fields, with little or no cross-fertilization between researcher areas, the researchers themselves, nor the research institutions. Clearly, this awareness will inform industry, journal editors and researchers of the need for a deeper exchange of ideas in any future research efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038865118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002

M3 - Review Article

VL - 87

SP - 235

EP - 247

JO - Automation in Construction

JF - Automation in Construction

SN - 0926-5805

ER -