TY - JOUR
T1 - Crisis resource management, simulation training and the medical emergency team
AU - Gillon, Stuart
AU - Radford, Sam
AU - Chalwin, Richard
AU - DeVita, Michael A
AU - Endacott, Ruth
AU - Jones, Daryl
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Recently there has been increased focus on improved
detection and management of deteriorating patients in
Australian hospitals. Since the introduction of the medical
emergency team (MET) model there has been an
increased role for intensive care unit staff in responding to
deterioration of patients in hospital wards. Review and
management of MET patients differs from the traditional
model of ward patient review, as ICU staff may not know
the patient. Furthermore, assessment and intervention is
often time-critical and must occur simultaneously. Finally,
about 10 of MET patients require intensive care-level
interventions to be commenced on the ward, and this
requires participation of non-ICU-trained ward staff.
? To date, the interventions performed by MET staff and
approaches to training responders have been relatively
under investigated, particularly in the Australian and New
Zealand context. In this article we briefly review the
principles of the MET and contend that activation of the
MET by ward staff represents a response to a medical
crisis. We then outline why MET intervention differs from
traditional ward-based doctor?patient encounters, and
emphasise the importance of non-technical skills during
the MET response. Finally, we suggest ways in which the
skills required for crisis resource management within the
MET can be taught to ICU staff, and the potential benefits,
barriers and difficulties associated with the delivery of
such training in New Zealand and Australia.
AB - Recently there has been increased focus on improved
detection and management of deteriorating patients in
Australian hospitals. Since the introduction of the medical
emergency team (MET) model there has been an
increased role for intensive care unit staff in responding to
deterioration of patients in hospital wards. Review and
management of MET patients differs from the traditional
model of ward patient review, as ICU staff may not know
the patient. Furthermore, assessment and intervention is
often time-critical and must occur simultaneously. Finally,
about 10 of MET patients require intensive care-level
interventions to be commenced on the ward, and this
requires participation of non-ICU-trained ward staff.
? To date, the interventions performed by MET staff and
approaches to training responders have been relatively
under investigated, particularly in the Australian and New
Zealand context. In this article we briefly review the
principles of the MET and contend that activation of the
MET by ward staff represents a response to a medical
crisis. We then outline why MET intervention differs from
traditional ward-based doctor?patient encounters, and
emphasise the importance of non-technical skills during
the MET response. Finally, we suggest ways in which the
skills required for crisis resource management within the
MET can be taught to ICU staff, and the potential benefits,
barriers and difficulties associated with the delivery of
such training in New Zealand and Australia.
UR - http://www.cicm.org.au/journal/2012/september/ccr_14_3_010912-227.pdf
M3 - Comment / Debate
VL - 14
SP - 227
EP - 235
JO - Critical Care and Resuscitation
JF - Critical Care and Resuscitation
SN - 1441-2772
IS - 3
ER -