Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Criminal hearsay in England and Wales: pragmatism, comparativism, and human rights

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The law of criminal hearsay in England and Wales has undergone substantial evolution in recent times. This article offers an analysis of these developments, undertaken against the background of a consideration of the reforms of hearsay doctrine that had taken place some years earlier in Canada. The relevant law in England and Wales appears highly regulated, being governed by detailed statutory provisions and subject further to an express “confrontation” guarantee contained in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Canadian law, by contrast, developed in a more piecemeal fashion and is not subject to any express “confrontation” guarantee. Comparisons of the law of criminal hearsay in England and Wales with that in Canada having largely been ignored in the academic literature,this article fills the gap and asks whether scholars and practitioners in each jurisdiction may gain valuable insights from the experiences of their counterparts across the Atlantic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-252
Number of pages26
JournalCanadian Criminal Law Review
Volume17
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Cite this