Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain

A study protocol

Joel J. Gagnier, Matthew J. Page, Hsiaomin Huang, Arianne P Verhagen, Rachelle Buchbinder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The selection of appropriate outcomes or domains is crucial when designing clinical trials, to appreciate the effects of different interventions, pool results, and make valid comparisons between trials. If the findings are to influence policy and practice, then the chosen outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders, including patients and the public, healthcare professionals and others making decisions about health care. There is a growing recognition that insufficient attention has been paid to the outcomes measured in clinical trials. Recent reviews of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder disorders revealed a large selection of diverse measures, many with questionable validity, reliability, and responsiveness. These issues could be addressed through the development and use of an agreed standardized collection of outcomes, known as a core outcome set (COS), which should be measured and reported in all trials of shoulder disorders. The purpose of the present project is to develop and disseminate a COS for clinical trials in shoulder disorders. Methods/Design: The methods for the COS development will include 3 phases: (1) a comprehensive review of the core domains used in shoulder disorder trials; (2) an international Delphi study involving relevant stakeholders (patients, clinicians, scientists) to define which domains should be core; and (3) an international focus group informed by the evidence identified in phases 1 and 2, to determine which measurement instruments best measure the core domains and identification of any evidence gaps that require further empiric evidence. Discussion: The aim of the current proposal is to convene several meetings of international experts and patients to develop a COS for clinical trials of shoulder disorders and to develop an implementation strategy to ensure rapid uptake of the core set of outcomes in clinical trials. There would be an expectation that the core set of outcomes would always be collected and reported, but it would not preclude use of additional outcomes in a particular trial.

Original languageEnglish
Article number336
JournalTrials
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Adhesive capsulitis
  • Clinical trials
  • Core outcome set
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Outcome measures
  • Pain
  • Rotator cuff
  • Shoulder

Cite this

@article{0a76961a1dd7481a9ea04a8ca6f42bdb,
title = "Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: A study protocol",
abstract = "Background: The selection of appropriate outcomes or domains is crucial when designing clinical trials, to appreciate the effects of different interventions, pool results, and make valid comparisons between trials. If the findings are to influence policy and practice, then the chosen outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders, including patients and the public, healthcare professionals and others making decisions about health care. There is a growing recognition that insufficient attention has been paid to the outcomes measured in clinical trials. Recent reviews of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder disorders revealed a large selection of diverse measures, many with questionable validity, reliability, and responsiveness. These issues could be addressed through the development and use of an agreed standardized collection of outcomes, known as a core outcome set (COS), which should be measured and reported in all trials of shoulder disorders. The purpose of the present project is to develop and disseminate a COS for clinical trials in shoulder disorders. Methods/Design: The methods for the COS development will include 3 phases: (1) a comprehensive review of the core domains used in shoulder disorder trials; (2) an international Delphi study involving relevant stakeholders (patients, clinicians, scientists) to define which domains should be core; and (3) an international focus group informed by the evidence identified in phases 1 and 2, to determine which measurement instruments best measure the core domains and identification of any evidence gaps that require further empiric evidence. Discussion: The aim of the current proposal is to convene several meetings of international experts and patients to develop a COS for clinical trials of shoulder disorders and to develop an implementation strategy to ensure rapid uptake of the core set of outcomes in clinical trials. There would be an expectation that the core set of outcomes would always be collected and reported, but it would not preclude use of additional outcomes in a particular trial.",
keywords = "Adhesive capsulitis, Clinical trials, Core outcome set, Osteoarthritis, Outcome measures, Pain, Rotator cuff, Shoulder",
author = "Gagnier, {Joel J.} and Page, {Matthew J.} and Hsiaomin Huang and Verhagen, {Arianne P} and Rachelle Buchbinder",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1186/s13063-017-2054-9",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain : A study protocol. / Gagnier, Joel J.; Page, Matthew J.; Huang, Hsiaomin; Verhagen, Arianne P; Buchbinder, Rachelle.

In: Trials, Vol. 18, No. 1, 336, 20.07.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain

T2 - A study protocol

AU - Gagnier, Joel J.

AU - Page, Matthew J.

AU - Huang, Hsiaomin

AU - Verhagen, Arianne P

AU - Buchbinder, Rachelle

PY - 2017/7/20

Y1 - 2017/7/20

N2 - Background: The selection of appropriate outcomes or domains is crucial when designing clinical trials, to appreciate the effects of different interventions, pool results, and make valid comparisons between trials. If the findings are to influence policy and practice, then the chosen outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders, including patients and the public, healthcare professionals and others making decisions about health care. There is a growing recognition that insufficient attention has been paid to the outcomes measured in clinical trials. Recent reviews of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder disorders revealed a large selection of diverse measures, many with questionable validity, reliability, and responsiveness. These issues could be addressed through the development and use of an agreed standardized collection of outcomes, known as a core outcome set (COS), which should be measured and reported in all trials of shoulder disorders. The purpose of the present project is to develop and disseminate a COS for clinical trials in shoulder disorders. Methods/Design: The methods for the COS development will include 3 phases: (1) a comprehensive review of the core domains used in shoulder disorder trials; (2) an international Delphi study involving relevant stakeholders (patients, clinicians, scientists) to define which domains should be core; and (3) an international focus group informed by the evidence identified in phases 1 and 2, to determine which measurement instruments best measure the core domains and identification of any evidence gaps that require further empiric evidence. Discussion: The aim of the current proposal is to convene several meetings of international experts and patients to develop a COS for clinical trials of shoulder disorders and to develop an implementation strategy to ensure rapid uptake of the core set of outcomes in clinical trials. There would be an expectation that the core set of outcomes would always be collected and reported, but it would not preclude use of additional outcomes in a particular trial.

AB - Background: The selection of appropriate outcomes or domains is crucial when designing clinical trials, to appreciate the effects of different interventions, pool results, and make valid comparisons between trials. If the findings are to influence policy and practice, then the chosen outcomes need to be relevant and important to key stakeholders, including patients and the public, healthcare professionals and others making decisions about health care. There is a growing recognition that insufficient attention has been paid to the outcomes measured in clinical trials. Recent reviews of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder disorders revealed a large selection of diverse measures, many with questionable validity, reliability, and responsiveness. These issues could be addressed through the development and use of an agreed standardized collection of outcomes, known as a core outcome set (COS), which should be measured and reported in all trials of shoulder disorders. The purpose of the present project is to develop and disseminate a COS for clinical trials in shoulder disorders. Methods/Design: The methods for the COS development will include 3 phases: (1) a comprehensive review of the core domains used in shoulder disorder trials; (2) an international Delphi study involving relevant stakeholders (patients, clinicians, scientists) to define which domains should be core; and (3) an international focus group informed by the evidence identified in phases 1 and 2, to determine which measurement instruments best measure the core domains and identification of any evidence gaps that require further empiric evidence. Discussion: The aim of the current proposal is to convene several meetings of international experts and patients to develop a COS for clinical trials of shoulder disorders and to develop an implementation strategy to ensure rapid uptake of the core set of outcomes in clinical trials. There would be an expectation that the core set of outcomes would always be collected and reported, but it would not preclude use of additional outcomes in a particular trial.

KW - Adhesive capsulitis

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Core outcome set

KW - Osteoarthritis

KW - Outcome measures

KW - Pain

KW - Rotator cuff

KW - Shoulder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025113231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-017-2054-9

DO - 10.1186/s13063-017-2054-9

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

IS - 1

M1 - 336

ER -