COVID-19 tests the limits of biodiversity laws in a health crisis: rethinking "country of origin" for virus access and benefit-sharing

Fran Humphries, Michelle Rourke, Todd Berry, Elizabeth Englezos, Charles Lawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic raises serious questions about the operation of international agreements for accessing and sharing viruses potentially delaying emergency responses. The access and benefit-sharing (ABS) frameworks under the United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity and its Nagoya Protocol apply to the collection and use of the COVID-19 pathogen SARS-CoV-2. These frameworks aim to ensure countries of origin reap some of the benefits from the use of their resources. Using real-world examples, we demonstrate conceptual and definitional ambiguities relating to "country of origin" that make not only operationalising the ABS scheme for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use objectives difficult but may also undermine public health emergency responses. Understanding how COVID-19 fits (or does not fit) within ABS laws is a valuable exercise for international policy-makers trying to determine how best to operationalise pathogen ABS, an issue currently under examination at the World Health Organization and critical to responding to pandemics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)684-706
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
Volume28
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • access and benefit sharing
  • Convention on Biological Diversity
  • country of origin
  • COVID-19
  • genetic resources

Cite this