Counterexamples: challenges faced by elementary students when testing a conjecture about the relationship between perimeter and area

Wanty Widjaja, Colleen Vale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

One pedagogical approach to challenge a persistent misconception is to get students to test a conjecture whereby they are confronted with the misconception. A common misconception about a ‘direct linear relationship’ between area and perimeter is well-documented. In this study, Year 4-6 students were presented with a conjecture that a rectangle with a larger perimeter will always have a larger area. Eighty-two (82) students’ written responses from three elementary schools in Victoria, Australia were analyzed. The findings revealed that Year 4-6 students could find multiple examples to support the conjecture but they struggled to find counterexamples to refute the conjecture. The findings underscored the importance of developing elementary school students’ capacity to construct counterexamples and recognize that it is sufficient to offer one counterexample in refuting a conjecture about all cases. Implications for ­teaching practice to support investigating and testing a conjecture are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)487-506
Number of pages20
JournalJournal on Mathematics Education
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

Keywords

  • Counterexamples
  • conjectures
  • perimeter
  • area
  • justifying
  • elementary students

Cite this