Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

CO2e emissions of renewable methanol from forestry residues and conventional natural gas-based methanol: a comparative analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A comparative analysis of CO2e emissions of renewable methanol produced from forestry residues (FR) and conventional methanol produced from natural gas (NG) is undertaken to assess which production pathway yields lower emissions. Pathways examined include steam methane reforming (SMR) of NG feedstocks, with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS), and steam or steam-O2 gasification of FR feedstocks with alternative syngas conditioning methods, including external H2 produced from electrolysis or NG SMR with and without CCS. Pathways are assessed across a range of carbon intensity of electricity (CIelec) scenarios. Assessment of production emissions incorporates land-use emissions, including direct land-use change (DLUC) and soil organic carbon (SOC) while post-production assessment considers methanol end-use as a fuel or chemical product. Findings show that NG pathway production emissions are driven by scope 1 and fugitive emissions. However, methanol production from FR pathways offers significant emissions reductions compared to NG pathways, particularly when using steam gasification with CO2 removal only or steam-O2 gasification with external H2 supplied from NG SMR with CCS. However, using electrolysis-based H2 requires a low CIelec to improve emissions relative to NG + CCS pathway and other FR pathways. Land-use and fugitive emissions can critically affect certain pathway comparisons, especially under moderate CIelec. Methanol use as a fuel leads to unavoidable emissions while use as a chemical product can achieve carbon storage through FR pathways, provided that secondary processing demands are relatively low and CIelec is moderate to low. Ultimately, renewable methanol has the potential to provide substantial climate change mitigation benefits, but its effectiveness depends on the syngas conditioning method, CCS implementation, and CIelec. Consideration of these factors is critical to realization of environmental benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6325-6343
Number of pages19
JournalEnergy and Environmental Science
Volume18
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jun 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  3. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Cite this