Corticomotor plasticity and learning of a ballistic thumb training task are diminished in older adults

Nigel Craig Rogasch, Tamara J Dartnall, John Cirillo, Michael A Nordstrom, John G Semmler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

144 Citations (Scopus)


This study examined changes in corticomotor excitability and plasticity after a thumb abduction training task in young and old adults. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were obtained from right abductor pollicis brevis (APB, target muscle) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM, control muscle) in 14 young (18-24 yr) and 14 old (61-82 yr) adults. The training task consisted of 300 ballistic abductions of the right thumb to maximize peak thumb abduction acceleration (TAAcc). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the left primary motor cortex was used to assess changes in APB and ADM motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) before, immediately after, and 30 min after training. No differences in corticomotor excitability (resting and active TMS thresholds, MEP input-output curves) or SICI were observed in young and old adults before training. Motor training resulted in improvements in peak TAAcc in young (177 improvement, P <0.001) and old (124 , P = 0.005) subjects, with greater improvements in young subjects (P = 0.002). Different thumb kinematics were observed during task performance, with increases in APB EMG related to improvements in peak TAAcc in young (r2 = 0.46, P = 0.008) but not old (r2 = 0.09, P = 0.3) adults. After training, APB MEPs were 50 larger (P <0.001 compared with before) in young subjects, with no change after training in old subjects (P = 0.49), suggesting reduced use-dependent corticomotor plasticity with advancing age. These changes were specific to APB, because no training-related change in MEP amplitude was observed in ADM. No significant association was observed between change in APB MEP and improvement in TAAcc with training in individual young and old subjects. SICI remained unchanged after training in both groups, suggesting that it was not responsible for the diminished use-dependent corticomotor plasticity for this task in older adults
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1874 - 1883
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Cite this