Corrigendum: A scoping review of chronotype and temporal patterns of eating of adults: Tools used, findings, and future directions (Nutrition Research Reviews (2021) (1-24) DOI: 10.1017/S0954422421000123)

Yan Yin Phoi; Michelle Rogers; Maxine P. Bonham; Jillian Dorrian; Alison M. Coates

doi:10.1017/S095442242200004X

Corrigendum: A scoping review of chronotype and temporal patterns of eating of adults: Tools used, findings, and future directions (Nutrition Research Reviews (2021) (1-24) DOI: 10.1017/S0954422421000123)

Yan Yin Phoi, Michelle Rogers, Maxine P. Bonham, Jillian Dorrian, Alison M. Coates

Nutrition Dietetics & Food

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review

Abstract

The authors would like to apologise for an error in the first paragraph of the Discussion section of the above paper. The second-last sentence of that paragraph read: In terms of identifying chronotype, the morningness-eveningness questionnaire was the preferred tool. This sentence should have read: In terms of identifying chronotype, the MCTQ was the preferred tool.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	176
Number of pages	1
Journal	Nutrition Research Reviews
Volume	36
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S095442242200004X
Publication status	Published - Jun 2023

Access to Document

10.1017/S095442242200004X

Cite this

@article{40b149ce40d24b85a860ba7732a79bed,

title = "Corrigendum: A scoping review of chronotype and temporal patterns of eating of adults: Tools used, findings, and future directions (Nutrition Research Reviews (2021) (1-24) DOI: 10.1017/S0954422421000123)",

abstract = "The authors would like to apologise for an error in the first paragraph of the Discussion section of the above paper. The second-last sentence of that paragraph read: In terms of identifying chronotype, the morningness-eveningness questionnaire was the preferred tool. This sentence should have read: In terms of identifying chronotype, the MCTQ was the preferred tool.",

author = "Phoi, \{Yan Yin\} and Michelle Rogers and Bonham, \{Maxine P.\} and Jillian Dorrian and Coates, \{Alison M.\}",

year = "2023",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1017/S095442242200004X",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "176",

journal = "Nutrition Research Reviews",

issn = "0954-4224",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

Corrigendum: A scoping review of chronotype and temporal patterns of eating of adults: Tools used, findings, and future directions (Nutrition Research Reviews (2021) (1-24) DOI: 10.1017/S0954422421000123). / Phoi, Yan Yin; Rogers, Michelle; Bonham, Maxine P. et al.
In: Nutrition Research Reviews, Vol. 36, No. 1, 06.2023, p. 176.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum

T2 - A scoping review of chronotype and temporal patterns of eating of adults: Tools used, findings, and future directions (Nutrition Research Reviews (2021) (1-24) DOI: 10.1017/S0954422421000123)

AU - Phoi, Yan Yin

AU - Rogers, Michelle

AU - Bonham, Maxine P.

AU - Dorrian, Jillian

AU - Coates, Alison M.

PY - 2023/6

Y1 - 2023/6

N2 - The authors would like to apologise for an error in the first paragraph of the Discussion section of the above paper. The second-last sentence of that paragraph read: In terms of identifying chronotype, the morningness-eveningness questionnaire was the preferred tool. This sentence should have read: In terms of identifying chronotype, the MCTQ was the preferred tool.

AB - The authors would like to apologise for an error in the first paragraph of the Discussion section of the above paper. The second-last sentence of that paragraph read: In terms of identifying chronotype, the morningness-eveningness questionnaire was the preferred tool. This sentence should have read: In terms of identifying chronotype, the MCTQ was the preferred tool.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159731895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S095442242200004X

DO - 10.1017/S095442242200004X

M3 - Comment / Debate

C2 - 35282844

AN - SCOPUS:85159731895

SN - 0954-4224

VL - 36

SP - 176

JO - Nutrition Research Reviews

JF - Nutrition Research Reviews

IS - 1

ER -

Corrigendum: A scoping review of chronotype and temporal patterns of eating of adults: Tools used, findings, and future directions (Nutrition Research Reviews (2021) (1-24) DOI: 10.1017/S0954422421000123)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Research output

A scoping review of chronotype and temporal patterns of eating of adults: Tools used, findings, and future directions

Cite this