Correction to: One step is enough

Research output: Contribution to journalComment / DebateOther


In this article, references 63 to 71 and their citations should have been (please see below): 63. Cobreros, P., Égré, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2012). Tolerant, classical, strict. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(2), 347–385. 64. Ripley, D. (2012). Conservatively extending classical logic with transparent truth. Review of Symbolic Logic, 5(2), 354–378. 65. Ripley, D. (2013). Revising up: strengthening classical logic in the face of paradox. Philosophers’ Imprint, 13(5), 1–13. 66. Ripley, D. (2013). Sorting out the sorites. In K. Tanaka, F. Berto, E. Mares, & F. Paoli (Eds.) Paraconsistency: logic and applications (pp. 329–348). Dordrecht: Springer. 67. Cobreros, P., Égré, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2013). Reaching transparent truth. Mind, 122(488), 841–866. 68. Ripley, D. (2015). Comparing substructural theories of truth. Ergo, 2(13), 299–328. 69. French, R. & Ripley, D. (2019). Two traditions in abstract model theory. Synthese. To appear. 70. French, R. & Ripley, D. (2019). Valuations: bi, tri, and tetra. Studia Logica, 107(6), 1313–1346. The original article has been corrected.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Philosophical Logic
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Cite this