Abstract
In the original publication of the article, the equation CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)/(1 + exp(BETA Predicted)) was formatted incorrectly under Model 2. The correct version is provided below: Model 2—assuming a 15-year-old female with a score of 50 in each functioning dimension: The original article has been corrected. BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (Physical Functioning) + 2.447472 * (Emotional Functioning) + 0.9967647 * (School Functioning) + 4.144465 * (Physical Functioning)2 + 0.1686639 * (Male) − 0.1198546 * (Age) CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)∕(1 + exp(BETAPredicted)) → BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (50∕100) + 2.447472 * (50∕100) + 0.9967647 * (50∕100) + 4.144465 * (50∕100)2 + 0.1686639 * 0 − 0.1198546 * 15 = 0.20991 → CHU9DPredicted = exp (0.20991)∕ (1 + exp (0.20991)) = 0.55 The original article has been corrected.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Quality of Life Research |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Research output
- 1 Article
-
Mapping PedsQLTM scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions
Sweeney, R., Chen, G., Gold, L., Mensah, F. & Wake, M., 2020, In: Quality of Life Research. 29, p. 639-652 14 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
23 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver