Correction to Mapping PedsQL™ scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions (Quality of Life Research, (2020), 29, 3, (639-652), 10.1007/s11136-019-02357-9)

Rohan Sweeney; Gang Chen; Lisa Gold; Fiona Mensah; Melissa Wake

doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02382-8

Correction to Mapping PedsQL™ scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions (Quality of Life Research, (2020), 29, 3, (639-652), 10.1007/s11136-019-02357-9)

Rohan Sweeney, Gang Chen, Lisa Gold, Fiona Mensah, Melissa Wake

Centre for Health Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review

Abstract

In the original publication of the article, the equation CHU9D_Predicted = exp(BETA_Predicted)/(1 + exp(BETA _Predicted)) was formatted incorrectly under Model 2. The correct version is provided below: Model 2—assuming a 15-year-old female with a score of 50 in each functioning dimension: The original article has been corrected. BETA_Predicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (Physical Functioning) + 2.447472 * (Emotional Functioning) + 0.9967647 * (School Functioning) + 4.144465 * (Physical Functioning)² + 0.1686639 * (Male) − 0.1198546 * (Age) CHU9D_Predicted = exp(BETA_Predicted)∕(1 + exp(BETA_Predicted)) → BETA_Predicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (50∕100) + 2.447472 * (50∕100) + 0.9967647 * (50∕100) + 4.144465 * (50∕100)² + 0.1686639 * 0 − 0.1198546 * 15 = 0.20991 → CHU9D_Predicted = exp (0.20991)∕ (1 + exp (0.20991)) = 0.55 The original article has been corrected.

Original language	English
Number of pages	1
Journal	Quality of Life Research
Volume	29
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02382-8
Publication status	Published - 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s11136-019-02382-8

Cite this

@article{d16cc443e65541ee92c4f7c3f4e90fa4,

title = "Correction to Mapping PedsQL{\texttrademark} scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions (Quality of Life Research, (2020), 29, 3, (639-652), 10.1007/s11136-019-02357-9)",

abstract = "In the original publication of the article, the equation CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)/(1 + exp(BETA Predicted)) was formatted incorrectly under Model 2. The correct version is provided below: Model 2—assuming a 15-year-old female with a score of 50 in each functioning dimension: The original article has been corrected. BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (Physical Functioning) + 2.447472 * (Emotional Functioning) + 0.9967647 * (School Functioning) + 4.144465 * (Physical Functioning)2 + 0.1686639 * (Male) − 0.1198546 * (Age) CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)∕(1 + exp(BETAPredicted)) → BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (50∕100) + 2.447472 * (50∕100) + 0.9967647 * (50∕100) + 4.144465 * (50∕100)2 + 0.1686639 * 0 − 0.1198546 * 15 = 0.20991 → CHU9DPredicted = exp (0.20991)∕ (1 + exp (0.20991)) = 0.55 The original article has been corrected.",

author = "Rohan Sweeney and Gang Chen and Lisa Gold and Fiona Mensah and Melissa Wake",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1007/s11136-019-02382-8",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

journal = "Quality of Life Research",

issn = "0962-9343",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "3",

}

Correction to Mapping PedsQL™ scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions (Quality of Life Research, (2020), 29, 3, (639-652), 10.1007/s11136-019-02357-9). / Sweeney, Rohan ; Chen, Gang; Gold, Lisa et al.
In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment / Debate › Other › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to Mapping PedsQL™ scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions (Quality of Life Research, (2020), 29, 3, (639-652), 10.1007/s11136-019-02357-9)

AU - Sweeney, Rohan

AU - Chen, Gang

AU - Gold, Lisa

AU - Mensah, Fiona

AU - Wake, Melissa

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In the original publication of the article, the equation CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)/(1 + exp(BETA Predicted)) was formatted incorrectly under Model 2. The correct version is provided below: Model 2—assuming a 15-year-old female with a score of 50 in each functioning dimension: The original article has been corrected. BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (Physical Functioning) + 2.447472 * (Emotional Functioning) + 0.9967647 * (School Functioning) + 4.144465 * (Physical Functioning)2 + 0.1686639 * (Male) − 0.1198546 * (Age) CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)∕(1 + exp(BETAPredicted)) → BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (50∕100) + 2.447472 * (50∕100) + 0.9967647 * (50∕100) + 4.144465 * (50∕100)2 + 0.1686639 * 0 − 0.1198546 * 15 = 0.20991 → CHU9DPredicted = exp (0.20991)∕ (1 + exp (0.20991)) = 0.55 The original article has been corrected.

AB - In the original publication of the article, the equation CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)/(1 + exp(BETA Predicted)) was formatted incorrectly under Model 2. The correct version is provided below: Model 2—assuming a 15-year-old female with a score of 50 in each functioning dimension: The original article has been corrected. BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (Physical Functioning) + 2.447472 * (Emotional Functioning) + 0.9967647 * (School Functioning) + 4.144465 * (Physical Functioning)2 + 0.1686639 * (Male) − 0.1198546 * (Age) CHU9DPredicted = exp(BETAPredicted)∕(1 + exp(BETAPredicted)) → BETAPredicted = 1.611745 − 4.724501 * (50∕100) + 2.447472 * (50∕100) + 0.9967647 * (50∕100) + 4.144465 * (50∕100)2 + 0.1686639 * 0 − 0.1198546 * 15 = 0.20991 → CHU9DPredicted = exp (0.20991)∕ (1 + exp (0.20991)) = 0.55 The original article has been corrected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078407991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-019-02382-8

DO - 10.1007/s11136-019-02382-8

M3 - Comment / Debate

C2 - 31993914

AN - SCOPUS:85078407991

SN - 0962-9343

VL - 29

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

IS - 3

ER -

Correction to Mapping PedsQL™ scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions (Quality of Life Research, (2020), 29, 3, (639-652), 10.1007/s11136-019-02357-9)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Mapping PedsQL^TM scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions

Cite this

Correction to Mapping PedsQL™ scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions (Quality of Life Research, (2020), 29, 3, (639-652), 10.1007/s11136-019-02357-9)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Research output

Mapping PedsQLTM scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions

Cite this

Mapping PedsQL^TM scores onto CHU9D utility scores: estimation, validation and a comparison of alternative instrument versions