Abstract
© 2019, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society. There was an isolated error relating to the Oh et al. study (1) within our recurrence-free survival analysis. When the reported estimates for Oh et al. are corrected, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) is now 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66 to 1.15; P=0.32.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1007-1008 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Research output
- 10 Citations
- 1 Review Article
-
Anesthetic technique and cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of total intravenous versus volatile anesthesia
Yap, A., Lopez-Olivo, M. A., Dubowitz, J., Hiller, J., Riedel, B. & the Global Onco-Anesthesia Research Collaboration Group, 15 May 2019, In: Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 66, 5, p. 546-561 16 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review Article › Research › peer-review
186 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver