Contrasting regional habitats for urban sustainability experimentation in Europe

Harm van den Heiligenberg, Gaston Heimeriks, Marko Hekkert, Rob Raven, Jifke Sol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The sustainability challenge requires experimentation with innovations, followed by an upscaling process towards a broader regime change in the long term. In Europe we observe various regional hotspots for sustainability experimentation which suggests that there are favorable spatial contexts. Little is known about why different kinds of experiments flourish or fail in various spatial contexts. In this paper we explore these contexts by using the habitat concept. A habitat is regarded as the configuration of favorable local and regional context factors for experimentation. To capture the diversity of these habitats we have constructed archetypical experimentation patterns. These patterns are built up of five dimensions: knowledge, governance, informal institutions, regional innovation advantages, and social learning. In a comparative case study in four city regions in Europe we find a large contrast in habitats. Countercultures play an important role, as they shape a beneficial context for experimentation through alternative ideas and lifestyles. We also find indications that it is important that a combination of several habitat factors is present, and that these factors have aligned and evolved over several years of experimentation, thus leading to a more mature habitat. The research suggests that regional stakeholders can positively influence most of the habitat factors shaping future upscaling. However, there are also some important factors, such as regional knowledge and skills, which have a path-dependent nature and are more difficult to improve in the short term.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1624
Number of pages24
JournalSustainability
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Countercultures
  • Experimentation
  • Geography of transitions
  • Regional innovation
  • Sustainability

Cite this

van den Heiligenberg, Harm ; Heimeriks, Gaston ; Hekkert, Marko ; Raven, Rob ; Sol, Jifke. / Contrasting regional habitats for urban sustainability experimentation in Europe. In: Sustainability. 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 5.
@article{7bdc20ebc40d489088289fd9eee87366,
title = "Contrasting regional habitats for urban sustainability experimentation in Europe",
abstract = "The sustainability challenge requires experimentation with innovations, followed by an upscaling process towards a broader regime change in the long term. In Europe we observe various regional hotspots for sustainability experimentation which suggests that there are favorable spatial contexts. Little is known about why different kinds of experiments flourish or fail in various spatial contexts. In this paper we explore these contexts by using the habitat concept. A habitat is regarded as the configuration of favorable local and regional context factors for experimentation. To capture the diversity of these habitats we have constructed archetypical experimentation patterns. These patterns are built up of five dimensions: knowledge, governance, informal institutions, regional innovation advantages, and social learning. In a comparative case study in four city regions in Europe we find a large contrast in habitats. Countercultures play an important role, as they shape a beneficial context for experimentation through alternative ideas and lifestyles. We also find indications that it is important that a combination of several habitat factors is present, and that these factors have aligned and evolved over several years of experimentation, thus leading to a more mature habitat. The research suggests that regional stakeholders can positively influence most of the habitat factors shaping future upscaling. However, there are also some important factors, such as regional knowledge and skills, which have a path-dependent nature and are more difficult to improve in the short term.",
keywords = "Countercultures, Experimentation, Geography of transitions, Regional innovation, Sustainability",
author = "{van den Heiligenberg}, Harm and Gaston Heimeriks and Marko Hekkert and Rob Raven and Jifke Sol",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.3390/su10051624",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "5",

}

van den Heiligenberg, H, Heimeriks, G, Hekkert, M, Raven, R & Sol, J 2018, 'Contrasting regional habitats for urban sustainability experimentation in Europe' Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 5, 1624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051624

Contrasting regional habitats for urban sustainability experimentation in Europe. / van den Heiligenberg, Harm; Heimeriks, Gaston; Hekkert, Marko; Raven, Rob; Sol, Jifke.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 5, 1624, 11.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting regional habitats for urban sustainability experimentation in Europe

AU - van den Heiligenberg, Harm

AU - Heimeriks, Gaston

AU - Hekkert, Marko

AU - Raven, Rob

AU - Sol, Jifke

PY - 2018/5/11

Y1 - 2018/5/11

N2 - The sustainability challenge requires experimentation with innovations, followed by an upscaling process towards a broader regime change in the long term. In Europe we observe various regional hotspots for sustainability experimentation which suggests that there are favorable spatial contexts. Little is known about why different kinds of experiments flourish or fail in various spatial contexts. In this paper we explore these contexts by using the habitat concept. A habitat is regarded as the configuration of favorable local and regional context factors for experimentation. To capture the diversity of these habitats we have constructed archetypical experimentation patterns. These patterns are built up of five dimensions: knowledge, governance, informal institutions, regional innovation advantages, and social learning. In a comparative case study in four city regions in Europe we find a large contrast in habitats. Countercultures play an important role, as they shape a beneficial context for experimentation through alternative ideas and lifestyles. We also find indications that it is important that a combination of several habitat factors is present, and that these factors have aligned and evolved over several years of experimentation, thus leading to a more mature habitat. The research suggests that regional stakeholders can positively influence most of the habitat factors shaping future upscaling. However, there are also some important factors, such as regional knowledge and skills, which have a path-dependent nature and are more difficult to improve in the short term.

AB - The sustainability challenge requires experimentation with innovations, followed by an upscaling process towards a broader regime change in the long term. In Europe we observe various regional hotspots for sustainability experimentation which suggests that there are favorable spatial contexts. Little is known about why different kinds of experiments flourish or fail in various spatial contexts. In this paper we explore these contexts by using the habitat concept. A habitat is regarded as the configuration of favorable local and regional context factors for experimentation. To capture the diversity of these habitats we have constructed archetypical experimentation patterns. These patterns are built up of five dimensions: knowledge, governance, informal institutions, regional innovation advantages, and social learning. In a comparative case study in four city regions in Europe we find a large contrast in habitats. Countercultures play an important role, as they shape a beneficial context for experimentation through alternative ideas and lifestyles. We also find indications that it is important that a combination of several habitat factors is present, and that these factors have aligned and evolved over several years of experimentation, thus leading to a more mature habitat. The research suggests that regional stakeholders can positively influence most of the habitat factors shaping future upscaling. However, there are also some important factors, such as regional knowledge and skills, which have a path-dependent nature and are more difficult to improve in the short term.

KW - Countercultures

KW - Experimentation

KW - Geography of transitions

KW - Regional innovation

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047134477&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su10051624

DO - 10.3390/su10051624

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 5

M1 - 1624

ER -