Contrasting CS student and academic perspectives and experiences of student engagement

Michael Morgan, Matthew Butler, Jane Sinclair, Christabel Gonsalvez, Neena Thota

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There is widespread acceptance of the use of national benchmarks to measure student engagement, including the North American National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in the USA and Canada, the Student Experience Survey (SES) in Australia, and the United Kingdom Engagement Survey (UKES). The performance of Computer Science (CS) on these benchmarks has generally been poor over a number of years and is consistently low across a range of instruments with little sign of improvement. It is difficult to argue that the technical nature of the CS discipline is the issue as related STEM disciplines consistently rate higher on many measures. Given the deteriorating performance of CS across multiple student engagement instruments, the urgency of addressing this issue is increasing. Missing from computing education research on this issue to date is the CS student voice and a deeper understanding of why CS students rate their experience so poorly. It is essential to seek the perspectives of both sides of the dialogue primarily responsible for creating the student experience. We carried out an in-depth analysis of student perspectives and experiences relating to their engagement in CS courses and compared it to the perspectives and experiences of CS academics. The outcome of this Working Group was a better understanding of areas of difference between CS students and academics on: what constitutes student engagement; who is responsible for student engagement; examples of both positive and negative engagement experiences in the classroom; and current initiatives to improve student engagement in their CS courses.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
EditorsGuido Rossling, Bruce Scharlau
Place of PublicationNew York NY USA
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Pages1-35
Number of pages35
ISBN (Electronic)9781450362238
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventAnnual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education 2018 - Larnaca, Cyprus
Duration: 2 Jul 20184 Jul 2018
Conference number: 23rd
https://iticse.acm.org/ITiCSE2018/

Conference

ConferenceAnnual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education 2018
Abbreviated titleITiCSE 2018
CountryCyprus
CityLarnaca
Period2/07/184/07/18
Internet address

Keywords

  • Computer science
  • National benchmarks
  • Student engagement
  • Student experiences

Cite this

Morgan, M., Butler, M., Sinclair, J., Gonsalvez, C., & Thota, N. (2018). Contrasting CS student and academic perspectives and experiences of student engagement. In G. Rossling, & B. Scharlau (Eds.), Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 1-35). New York NY USA: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3293881.3295777
Morgan, Michael ; Butler, Matthew ; Sinclair, Jane ; Gonsalvez, Christabel ; Thota, Neena. / Contrasting CS student and academic perspectives and experiences of student engagement. Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . editor / Guido Rossling ; Bruce Scharlau. New York NY USA : Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2018. pp. 1-35
@inproceedings{568262ec9f744156aaa85faf426ffcfc,
title = "Contrasting CS student and academic perspectives and experiences of student engagement",
abstract = "There is widespread acceptance of the use of national benchmarks to measure student engagement, including the North American National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in the USA and Canada, the Student Experience Survey (SES) in Australia, and the United Kingdom Engagement Survey (UKES). The performance of Computer Science (CS) on these benchmarks has generally been poor over a number of years and is consistently low across a range of instruments with little sign of improvement. It is difficult to argue that the technical nature of the CS discipline is the issue as related STEM disciplines consistently rate higher on many measures. Given the deteriorating performance of CS across multiple student engagement instruments, the urgency of addressing this issue is increasing. Missing from computing education research on this issue to date is the CS student voice and a deeper understanding of why CS students rate their experience so poorly. It is essential to seek the perspectives of both sides of the dialogue primarily responsible for creating the student experience. We carried out an in-depth analysis of student perspectives and experiences relating to their engagement in CS courses and compared it to the perspectives and experiences of CS academics. The outcome of this Working Group was a better understanding of areas of difference between CS students and academics on: what constitutes student engagement; who is responsible for student engagement; examples of both positive and negative engagement experiences in the classroom; and current initiatives to improve student engagement in their CS courses.",
keywords = "Computer science, National benchmarks, Student engagement, Student experiences",
author = "Michael Morgan and Matthew Butler and Jane Sinclair and Christabel Gonsalvez and Neena Thota",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1145/3293881.3295777",
language = "English",
pages = "1--35",
editor = "Guido Rossling and Bruce Scharlau",
booktitle = "Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
address = "United States of America",

}

Morgan, M, Butler, M, Sinclair, J, Gonsalvez, C & Thota, N 2018, Contrasting CS student and academic perspectives and experiences of student engagement. in G Rossling & B Scharlau (eds), Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), New York NY USA, pp. 1-35, Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education 2018, Larnaca, Cyprus, 2/07/18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3293881.3295777

Contrasting CS student and academic perspectives and experiences of student engagement. / Morgan, Michael; Butler, Matthew; Sinclair, Jane; Gonsalvez, Christabel; Thota, Neena.

Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . ed. / Guido Rossling; Bruce Scharlau. New York NY USA : Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2018. p. 1-35.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Contrasting CS student and academic perspectives and experiences of student engagement

AU - Morgan, Michael

AU - Butler, Matthew

AU - Sinclair, Jane

AU - Gonsalvez, Christabel

AU - Thota, Neena

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - There is widespread acceptance of the use of national benchmarks to measure student engagement, including the North American National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in the USA and Canada, the Student Experience Survey (SES) in Australia, and the United Kingdom Engagement Survey (UKES). The performance of Computer Science (CS) on these benchmarks has generally been poor over a number of years and is consistently low across a range of instruments with little sign of improvement. It is difficult to argue that the technical nature of the CS discipline is the issue as related STEM disciplines consistently rate higher on many measures. Given the deteriorating performance of CS across multiple student engagement instruments, the urgency of addressing this issue is increasing. Missing from computing education research on this issue to date is the CS student voice and a deeper understanding of why CS students rate their experience so poorly. It is essential to seek the perspectives of both sides of the dialogue primarily responsible for creating the student experience. We carried out an in-depth analysis of student perspectives and experiences relating to their engagement in CS courses and compared it to the perspectives and experiences of CS academics. The outcome of this Working Group was a better understanding of areas of difference between CS students and academics on: what constitutes student engagement; who is responsible for student engagement; examples of both positive and negative engagement experiences in the classroom; and current initiatives to improve student engagement in their CS courses.

AB - There is widespread acceptance of the use of national benchmarks to measure student engagement, including the North American National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) in the USA and Canada, the Student Experience Survey (SES) in Australia, and the United Kingdom Engagement Survey (UKES). The performance of Computer Science (CS) on these benchmarks has generally been poor over a number of years and is consistently low across a range of instruments with little sign of improvement. It is difficult to argue that the technical nature of the CS discipline is the issue as related STEM disciplines consistently rate higher on many measures. Given the deteriorating performance of CS across multiple student engagement instruments, the urgency of addressing this issue is increasing. Missing from computing education research on this issue to date is the CS student voice and a deeper understanding of why CS students rate their experience so poorly. It is essential to seek the perspectives of both sides of the dialogue primarily responsible for creating the student experience. We carried out an in-depth analysis of student perspectives and experiences relating to their engagement in CS courses and compared it to the perspectives and experiences of CS academics. The outcome of this Working Group was a better understanding of areas of difference between CS students and academics on: what constitutes student engagement; who is responsible for student engagement; examples of both positive and negative engagement experiences in the classroom; and current initiatives to improve student engagement in their CS courses.

KW - Computer science

KW - National benchmarks

KW - Student engagement

KW - Student experiences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061161865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3293881.3295777

DO - 10.1145/3293881.3295777

M3 - Conference Paper

SP - 1

EP - 35

BT - Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

A2 - Rossling, Guido

A2 - Scharlau, Bruce

PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

CY - New York NY USA

ER -

Morgan M, Butler M, Sinclair J, Gonsalvez C, Thota N. Contrasting CS student and academic perspectives and experiences of student engagement. In Rossling G, Scharlau B, editors, Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education . New York NY USA: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 2018. p. 1-35 https://doi.org/10.1145/3293881.3295777