TY - JOUR
T1 - Consumer engagement critical to success in an Australian research project
T2 - Reflections from those involved
AU - Synnot, Anneliese J.
AU - Cherry, Catherine L.
AU - Summers, Michael P.
AU - Stuckey, Rwth
AU - Milne, Catherine A.
AU - Lowe, DIanne B.
AU - Hill, Sophie J.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - This paper describes the people, activities and methods of consumer engagement in a complex research project, and reflects on the influence this had on the research and people involved, and enablers and challenges of engagement. The 2.5-year Integrating and Deriving Evidence Experiences and Preferences (IN-DEEP) study was conducted to develop online consumer summaries of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment evidence in partnership with a three-member consumer advisory group. Engagement methods included 6-monthly face-to-face meetings and email contact. Advisory group members were active in planning, conduct and dissemination and translational phases of the research. Engaging consumers in this way improved the quality of the research process and outputs by: being more responsive to, and reflective of, the experiences of Australians with MS; expanding the research reach and depth; and improving the researchers' capacity to manage study challenges. Advisory group members found contributing their expertise to MS research satisfying and empowering, whereas researchers gained confidence in the research direction. Managing the unpredictability of MS was a substantive challenge; the key enabler was the 'brokering role' of the researcher based at an MS organisation. Meaningfully engaging consumers with a range of skills, experiences and networks can make important and unforeseen contributions to research success. Journal compilation
AB - This paper describes the people, activities and methods of consumer engagement in a complex research project, and reflects on the influence this had on the research and people involved, and enablers and challenges of engagement. The 2.5-year Integrating and Deriving Evidence Experiences and Preferences (IN-DEEP) study was conducted to develop online consumer summaries of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment evidence in partnership with a three-member consumer advisory group. Engagement methods included 6-monthly face-to-face meetings and email contact. Advisory group members were active in planning, conduct and dissemination and translational phases of the research. Engaging consumers in this way improved the quality of the research process and outputs by: being more responsive to, and reflective of, the experiences of Australians with MS; expanding the research reach and depth; and improving the researchers' capacity to manage study challenges. Advisory group members found contributing their expertise to MS research satisfying and empowering, whereas researchers gained confidence in the research direction. Managing the unpredictability of MS was a substantive challenge; the key enabler was the 'brokering role' of the researcher based at an MS organisation. Meaningfully engaging consumers with a range of skills, experiences and networks can make important and unforeseen contributions to research success. Journal compilation
KW - consumer participation
KW - multiple sclerosis
KW - online health information
KW - patient and public involvement
KW - research involvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049212633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1071/PY17107
DO - 10.1071/PY17107
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049212633
SN - 1448-7527
VL - 24
SP - 197
EP - 203
JO - Australian Journal of Primary Health
JF - Australian Journal of Primary Health
IS - 3
ER -