Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Considerations for unblinding individual study participants during vaccine trials

  • Neal Halsey
  • , Stephen Evans
  • , Mathuram Santosham
  • , Adam Hacker
  • , Kathryn M. Edwards
  • , Rebecca E. Chandler
  • , Matthew Z. Dudley
  • , Cornelia L. Dekker
  • , Seif Al-Abri
  • , Narendra Arora
  • , Jim Buttery
  • , Alex Dodoo
  • , Juhani Eskola
  • , Ulrich Heininger
  • , Youngmee Jee
  • , Najwa Khuri
  • , Stephen Obaro
  • , Walt Orenstein
  • , Punnee Pitisuttithum
  • , Marco Safadi
  • Cynthia G. Whitney, Steve Black, other members of the SPEAC meta-DSMB

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleOtherpeer-review

Abstract

Premature unblinding of individual participants is rarely reported in publications, but such unblinding can disrupt vaccine trials by causing worry and drop-out of other participants or “pseudo unblinding,” in which participants or investigators over-interpret certain symptoms as being related to receiving an investigational product. This review summarizes appropriate reasons for unblinding in vaccine trials. Regulatory guidance could be improved by distinguishing guidance for vaccine trials from drug trials, with the recognition that unblinding individual participants in vaccine studies is rarely needed for management of adverse events following immunization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3399-3402
Number of pages4
JournalVaccine
Volume41
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Regulatory guidance
  • Unblinding
  • Vaccine
  • Vaccine safety
  • Vaccine trials

Cite this