Conservation practitioners’ understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Both academics and practitioners consider a lack of knowledge about evolutionary theory to be a general barrier to effectively managing genetic diversity. However, it is challenging to judge practitioners’ level of understanding and how this influences their management decisions. Knowledge built through experience may be difficult for practitioners to articulate, but could nonetheless result in appropriate management strategies. To date, researchers have assessed only the explicit (formal) knowledge practitioners have of evolutionary concepts. To explore practitioners’ understanding of evolutionary concepts, it is necessary to consider how they might apply explicit and implicit knowledge to their management decisions. Using an online survey, we asked Australian practitioners to respond to 2 common management scenarios in which there is strong evidence that managing genetic diversity can improve outcomes: managing small, isolated populations and sourcing seeds for restoration projects. In describing their approach to these scenarios, practitioners demonstrated a stronger understanding of the effective management of genetic diversity than the definitions of the relevant concepts. However, their management of genetic diversity within small populations was closer to best practice than for restoration projects. Moreover, the risks practitioners described in implementing best practice management were more likely to affect their approach to restoration than translocation projects. These findings provide evidence that strategies to build the capacity of practitioners to manage genetic diversity should focus on realistic management scenarios. Given that practitioners recognize the importance of adapting their practices and the strong evidence for the benefits of actively managing genetic diversity, there is hope that better engagement by evolutionary biologists with practitioners could facilitate significant shifts toward evolutionarily enlightened management.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages9
JournalConservation Biology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 13 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • aprender al hacer
  • depresión endogámica
  • depresión exogámica
  • flujo génico
  • gene flow
  • inbreeding depression
  • intercambio de conocimiento
  • knowledge exchange
  • learning by doing
  • outbreeding depression
  • restauración
  • restoration
  • reubicación
  • translocation

Cite this

@article{3dc56231fe6146a08f727ba457482d72,
title = "Conservation practitioners’ understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes",
abstract = "Both academics and practitioners consider a lack of knowledge about evolutionary theory to be a general barrier to effectively managing genetic diversity. However, it is challenging to judge practitioners’ level of understanding and how this influences their management decisions. Knowledge built through experience may be difficult for practitioners to articulate, but could nonetheless result in appropriate management strategies. To date, researchers have assessed only the explicit (formal) knowledge practitioners have of evolutionary concepts. To explore practitioners’ understanding of evolutionary concepts, it is necessary to consider how they might apply explicit and implicit knowledge to their management decisions. Using an online survey, we asked Australian practitioners to respond to 2 common management scenarios in which there is strong evidence that managing genetic diversity can improve outcomes: managing small, isolated populations and sourcing seeds for restoration projects. In describing their approach to these scenarios, practitioners demonstrated a stronger understanding of the effective management of genetic diversity than the definitions of the relevant concepts. However, their management of genetic diversity within small populations was closer to best practice than for restoration projects. Moreover, the risks practitioners described in implementing best practice management were more likely to affect their approach to restoration than translocation projects. These findings provide evidence that strategies to build the capacity of practitioners to manage genetic diversity should focus on realistic management scenarios. Given that practitioners recognize the importance of adapting their practices and the strong evidence for the benefits of actively managing genetic diversity, there is hope that better engagement by evolutionary biologists with practitioners could facilitate significant shifts toward evolutionarily enlightened management.",
keywords = "aprender al hacer, depresi{\'o}n endog{\'a}mica, depresi{\'o}n exog{\'a}mica, flujo g{\'e}nico, gene flow, inbreeding depression, intercambio de conocimiento, knowledge exchange, learning by doing, outbreeding depression, restauraci{\'o}n, restoration, reubicaci{\'o}n, translocation",
author = "Cook, {Carly N.} and Carla Sgro",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1111/cobi.13306",
language = "English",
journal = "Conservation Biology",
issn = "0888-8892",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Conservation practitioners’ understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes. / Cook, Carly N.; Sgro, Carla.

In: Conservation Biology, 13.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservation practitioners’ understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes

AU - Cook, Carly N.

AU - Sgro, Carla

PY - 2019/3/13

Y1 - 2019/3/13

N2 - Both academics and practitioners consider a lack of knowledge about evolutionary theory to be a general barrier to effectively managing genetic diversity. However, it is challenging to judge practitioners’ level of understanding and how this influences their management decisions. Knowledge built through experience may be difficult for practitioners to articulate, but could nonetheless result in appropriate management strategies. To date, researchers have assessed only the explicit (formal) knowledge practitioners have of evolutionary concepts. To explore practitioners’ understanding of evolutionary concepts, it is necessary to consider how they might apply explicit and implicit knowledge to their management decisions. Using an online survey, we asked Australian practitioners to respond to 2 common management scenarios in which there is strong evidence that managing genetic diversity can improve outcomes: managing small, isolated populations and sourcing seeds for restoration projects. In describing their approach to these scenarios, practitioners demonstrated a stronger understanding of the effective management of genetic diversity than the definitions of the relevant concepts. However, their management of genetic diversity within small populations was closer to best practice than for restoration projects. Moreover, the risks practitioners described in implementing best practice management were more likely to affect their approach to restoration than translocation projects. These findings provide evidence that strategies to build the capacity of practitioners to manage genetic diversity should focus on realistic management scenarios. Given that practitioners recognize the importance of adapting their practices and the strong evidence for the benefits of actively managing genetic diversity, there is hope that better engagement by evolutionary biologists with practitioners could facilitate significant shifts toward evolutionarily enlightened management.

AB - Both academics and practitioners consider a lack of knowledge about evolutionary theory to be a general barrier to effectively managing genetic diversity. However, it is challenging to judge practitioners’ level of understanding and how this influences their management decisions. Knowledge built through experience may be difficult for practitioners to articulate, but could nonetheless result in appropriate management strategies. To date, researchers have assessed only the explicit (formal) knowledge practitioners have of evolutionary concepts. To explore practitioners’ understanding of evolutionary concepts, it is necessary to consider how they might apply explicit and implicit knowledge to their management decisions. Using an online survey, we asked Australian practitioners to respond to 2 common management scenarios in which there is strong evidence that managing genetic diversity can improve outcomes: managing small, isolated populations and sourcing seeds for restoration projects. In describing their approach to these scenarios, practitioners demonstrated a stronger understanding of the effective management of genetic diversity than the definitions of the relevant concepts. However, their management of genetic diversity within small populations was closer to best practice than for restoration projects. Moreover, the risks practitioners described in implementing best practice management were more likely to affect their approach to restoration than translocation projects. These findings provide evidence that strategies to build the capacity of practitioners to manage genetic diversity should focus on realistic management scenarios. Given that practitioners recognize the importance of adapting their practices and the strong evidence for the benefits of actively managing genetic diversity, there is hope that better engagement by evolutionary biologists with practitioners could facilitate significant shifts toward evolutionarily enlightened management.

KW - aprender al hacer

KW - depresión endogámica

KW - depresión exogámica

KW - flujo génico

KW - gene flow

KW - inbreeding depression

KW - intercambio de conocimiento

KW - knowledge exchange

KW - learning by doing

KW - outbreeding depression

KW - restauración

KW - restoration

KW - reubicación

KW - translocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063720388&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cobi.13306

DO - 10.1111/cobi.13306

M3 - Article

JO - Conservation Biology

JF - Conservation Biology

SN - 0888-8892

ER -