Confirming changes in beliefs and intentions

Rajah Annamalai Subramanian, Sanjeev Kumar, Philip Cohen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperOtherpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Today's spoken dialog systems rely on procedures such as confidence scores, machine learning approaches, etc. to understand changes in users' beliefs and intentions. They depend on these scores to decide when to do an implicit or explicit confirmation of a value obtained to fill a required slot. These approaches work reasonably well for small domain-based systems and to make them work, several rules need to be written. Similarly, more rules are necessary to handle the changes in the confidence scores for the values heard from the users, as and when the user changes his belief over a particular value he had given earlier. We propose that a joint intention interpreter integrated with a reasoner over beliefs and communicative acts to form the core of a dialogue engine can handle such belief updates and changes in intentions in a general domain independent manner. We show how the confirmations and clarifications can be automatically planned as and when new or contradictory beliefs are received. Furthermore, these changes in beliefs and intentions are cascaded to other agents and humans in the team that are part of the joint commitment. There is no necessity to write explicit rules and conditions to handle these changes, and communication follows from the constructs of the Joint Intentions Theory (JIT).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIntentions in Intelligent Systems - Papers from the 2007 AAAI Spring Symposium, Technical Report
Number of pages2
Publication statusPublished - 28 Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes
EventAAAI Spring Symposium 2007 - Stanford, United States of America
Duration: 26 Mar 200728 Mar 2007

Publication series

NameAAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report


ConferenceAAAI Spring Symposium 2007
Country/TerritoryUnited States of America

Cite this