Abstract
Objective: To consider the use of the diagnostic category ‘complex posttraumatic stress disorder’ (c-PTSD) as detailed in the forthcoming ICD-11 classification system as a less stigmatising, more clinically useful term, instead of the current DSM-5 defined condition of ‘borderline personality disorder’ (BPD). Conclusions: Trauma, in its broadest definition, plays a key role in the development of both c-PTSD and BPD. Given this current lack of differentiation between these conditions, and the high stigma faced by people with BPD, it seems reasonable to consider using the diagnostic term ‘complex posttraumatic stress disorder’ to decrease stigma and provide a trauma-informed approach for BPD patients.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 333-335 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Australasian Psychiatry |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- borderline personality disorder
- complex posttraumatic stress disorder
- neurobiology
- stigma
- trauma
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver