Competition and substitution between public transport modes

Nils Fearnley, Graham Currie, Stefan Flügel, Fredrik A. Gregersen, Marit Killi, Jeremy Toner, Mark Wardman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperOther

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The management and understanding of modal split between public transport (PT) modes is of interest for numerous reasons. It may, for example, be desirable to stimulate passengers to switch from crowded buses and over to higher capacity rail. This requires a good understanding of drivers of transit modal substitution. The evidence put forward in this paper is based on more than 150 empirically estimated cross elasticities between PT modes from over 20 sources collected from Australia, Europe and USA. These sources include scientifically published evidence as well as grey literature. This evidence is coded into a database from which our paper presents and analyses the available cross-PT-modal demand relations. We focus on evidence for how fares, travel time and service intervals on PT ‘mode A’ affect the demand for PT ‘mode B’. Despite generally low levels of substitution between PT modes, passengers are particularly sensitive to in-vehicle, access/egress and waiting time in choosing PT mode and less so for fare variations. In general, rail demand is less sensitive to changes in bus than bus demand is to changes in rail. We also find that peak-hour demand more markedly switches between PT modes than off-peak demand does.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch in Transportation Economics
PublisherElsevier
Pages51-58
Number of pages8
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018
EventInternational Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport (Thredbo) 2017 - Stockholm, Sweden
Duration: 13 Aug 201717 Aug 2017
Conference number: 15th

Publication series

NameResearch in Transportation Economics
PublisherElsevier
ISSN (Print)0739-8859

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport (Thredbo) 2017
CountrySweden
CityStockholm
Period13/08/1717/08/17

Keywords

  • Cross-elasticity
  • Demand
  • Mode shift
  • Passenger transport
  • Substitution

Cite this

Fearnley, N., Currie, G., Flügel, S., Gregersen, F. A., Killi, M., Toner, J., & Wardman, M. (2018). Competition and substitution between public transport modes. In Research in Transportation Economics (Vol. 69, pp. 51-58). (Research in Transportation Economics). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.005
Fearnley, Nils ; Currie, Graham ; Flügel, Stefan ; Gregersen, Fredrik A. ; Killi, Marit ; Toner, Jeremy ; Wardman, Mark. / Competition and substitution between public transport modes. Research in Transportation Economics. Vol. 69 Elsevier, 2018. pp. 51-58 (Research in Transportation Economics).
@inproceedings{5e031231b78a4db4b24a466443fdc399,
title = "Competition and substitution between public transport modes",
abstract = "The management and understanding of modal split between public transport (PT) modes is of interest for numerous reasons. It may, for example, be desirable to stimulate passengers to switch from crowded buses and over to higher capacity rail. This requires a good understanding of drivers of transit modal substitution. The evidence put forward in this paper is based on more than 150 empirically estimated cross elasticities between PT modes from over 20 sources collected from Australia, Europe and USA. These sources include scientifically published evidence as well as grey literature. This evidence is coded into a database from which our paper presents and analyses the available cross-PT-modal demand relations. We focus on evidence for how fares, travel time and service intervals on PT ‘mode A’ affect the demand for PT ‘mode B’. Despite generally low levels of substitution between PT modes, passengers are particularly sensitive to in-vehicle, access/egress and waiting time in choosing PT mode and less so for fare variations. In general, rail demand is less sensitive to changes in bus than bus demand is to changes in rail. We also find that peak-hour demand more markedly switches between PT modes than off-peak demand does.",
keywords = "Cross-elasticity, Demand, Mode shift, Passenger transport, Substitution",
author = "Nils Fearnley and Graham Currie and Stefan Fl{\"u}gel and Gregersen, {Fredrik A.} and Marit Killi and Jeremy Toner and Mark Wardman",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
series = "Research in Transportation Economics",
publisher = "Elsevier",
pages = "51--58",
booktitle = "Research in Transportation Economics",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Fearnley, N, Currie, G, Flügel, S, Gregersen, FA, Killi, M, Toner, J & Wardman, M 2018, Competition and substitution between public transport modes. in Research in Transportation Economics. vol. 69, Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, pp. 51-58, International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport (Thredbo) 2017, Stockholm, Sweden, 13/08/17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.005

Competition and substitution between public transport modes. / Fearnley, Nils; Currie, Graham; Flügel, Stefan; Gregersen, Fredrik A.; Killi, Marit; Toner, Jeremy; Wardman, Mark.

Research in Transportation Economics. Vol. 69 Elsevier, 2018. p. 51-58 (Research in Transportation Economics).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference PaperOther

TY - GEN

T1 - Competition and substitution between public transport modes

AU - Fearnley, Nils

AU - Currie, Graham

AU - Flügel, Stefan

AU - Gregersen, Fredrik A.

AU - Killi, Marit

AU - Toner, Jeremy

AU - Wardman, Mark

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - The management and understanding of modal split between public transport (PT) modes is of interest for numerous reasons. It may, for example, be desirable to stimulate passengers to switch from crowded buses and over to higher capacity rail. This requires a good understanding of drivers of transit modal substitution. The evidence put forward in this paper is based on more than 150 empirically estimated cross elasticities between PT modes from over 20 sources collected from Australia, Europe and USA. These sources include scientifically published evidence as well as grey literature. This evidence is coded into a database from which our paper presents and analyses the available cross-PT-modal demand relations. We focus on evidence for how fares, travel time and service intervals on PT ‘mode A’ affect the demand for PT ‘mode B’. Despite generally low levels of substitution between PT modes, passengers are particularly sensitive to in-vehicle, access/egress and waiting time in choosing PT mode and less so for fare variations. In general, rail demand is less sensitive to changes in bus than bus demand is to changes in rail. We also find that peak-hour demand more markedly switches between PT modes than off-peak demand does.

AB - The management and understanding of modal split between public transport (PT) modes is of interest for numerous reasons. It may, for example, be desirable to stimulate passengers to switch from crowded buses and over to higher capacity rail. This requires a good understanding of drivers of transit modal substitution. The evidence put forward in this paper is based on more than 150 empirically estimated cross elasticities between PT modes from over 20 sources collected from Australia, Europe and USA. These sources include scientifically published evidence as well as grey literature. This evidence is coded into a database from which our paper presents and analyses the available cross-PT-modal demand relations. We focus on evidence for how fares, travel time and service intervals on PT ‘mode A’ affect the demand for PT ‘mode B’. Despite generally low levels of substitution between PT modes, passengers are particularly sensitive to in-vehicle, access/egress and waiting time in choosing PT mode and less so for fare variations. In general, rail demand is less sensitive to changes in bus than bus demand is to changes in rail. We also find that peak-hour demand more markedly switches between PT modes than off-peak demand does.

KW - Cross-elasticity

KW - Demand

KW - Mode shift

KW - Passenger transport

KW - Substitution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047412495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.005

M3 - Conference Paper

AN - SCOPUS:85047412495

VL - 69

T3 - Research in Transportation Economics

SP - 51

EP - 58

BT - Research in Transportation Economics

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Fearnley N, Currie G, Flügel S, Gregersen FA, Killi M, Toner J et al. Competition and substitution between public transport modes. In Research in Transportation Economics. Vol. 69. Elsevier. 2018. p. 51-58. (Research in Transportation Economics). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.05.005