Compensation system experience at 12 months after road or workplace injury in Victoria, Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Seeking or receiving compensation after injury is frequently associated with poor recovery. Previous research has shown that the stressful nature of compensation procedures and perceived injustice may cause secondary harm. This study examined compensation system experiences in compensation claimants in Victoria, Australia, and explored the relationship between these experiences and injury outcomes. One hundred and sixty compensable patients (120 male, 75.0 %) aged 18–67 years (M = 43.01, SD = 14.31), hospitalized for an injury in a motor vehicle crash (n = 137) or at work (n = 23), participated. Participants completed questionnaires about compensation system experience, pain, and psychological symptoms 12 months after injury. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the compensation system experience items revealed three components explaining 66.64 % of the variance in compensation experience: (1) “negative procedural experience” (47.29 %), (2) “compensation supported recovery” (10.43 %), and (3) “positive procedural experience” (8.92 %). Worse experience on all components was associated with worse pain (severity, interference, catastrophizing, disability) and psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, PTSD, perceived injustice). Compensation system experience reflected both negative and positive procedural factors, and feeling supported through recovery. Most participants reported having positive experiences; however, those who were frustrated or stressed from compensation procedures had worse pain and psychological health outcomes. While this association is likely to be bidirectional with “non-recovery” also impacting on compensation experience appraisals, compensation schemes should nonetheless address modifiable sources of procedural injustice (e.g., arduous paperwork and approvals processes) and reinforce procedures that generate perceptions of support (e.g., timely and appropriate access to health services).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)376-389
Number of pages14
JournalPsychological Injury and Law
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Compensation
  • Injustice
  • Motor vehicle collision
  • Pain
  • Psychological functioning
  • Trauma
  • Workplace injury

Cite this

@article{6b679af061fe4c65ab526c0eff07c7a7,
title = "Compensation system experience at 12 months after road or workplace injury in Victoria, Australia",
abstract = "Seeking or receiving compensation after injury is frequently associated with poor recovery. Previous research has shown that the stressful nature of compensation procedures and perceived injustice may cause secondary harm. This study examined compensation system experiences in compensation claimants in Victoria, Australia, and explored the relationship between these experiences and injury outcomes. One hundred and sixty compensable patients (120 male, 75.0 {\%}) aged 18–67 years (M = 43.01, SD = 14.31), hospitalized for an injury in a motor vehicle crash (n = 137) or at work (n = 23), participated. Participants completed questionnaires about compensation system experience, pain, and psychological symptoms 12 months after injury. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the compensation system experience items revealed three components explaining 66.64 {\%} of the variance in compensation experience: (1) “negative procedural experience” (47.29 {\%}), (2) “compensation supported recovery” (10.43 {\%}), and (3) “positive procedural experience” (8.92 {\%}). Worse experience on all components was associated with worse pain (severity, interference, catastrophizing, disability) and psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, PTSD, perceived injustice). Compensation system experience reflected both negative and positive procedural factors, and feeling supported through recovery. Most participants reported having positive experiences; however, those who were frustrated or stressed from compensation procedures had worse pain and psychological health outcomes. While this association is likely to be bidirectional with “non-recovery” also impacting on compensation experience appraisals, compensation schemes should nonetheless address modifiable sources of procedural injustice (e.g., arduous paperwork and approvals processes) and reinforce procedures that generate perceptions of support (e.g., timely and appropriate access to health services).",
keywords = "Compensation, Injustice, Motor vehicle collision, Pain, Psychological functioning, Trauma, Workplace injury",
author = "Liane Ioannou and Sandra Braaf and Peter Cameron and Gibson, {Stephen J.} and Jennie Ponsford and Jennings, {Paul A.} and Arnold, {Carolyn A.} and Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis and Giummarra, {Melita J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s12207-016-9275-1",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "376--389",
journal = "Psychological Injury and Law",
issn = "1938-971X",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compensation system experience at 12 months after road or workplace injury in Victoria, Australia

AU - Ioannou, Liane

AU - Braaf, Sandra

AU - Cameron, Peter

AU - Gibson, Stephen J.

AU - Ponsford, Jennie

AU - Jennings, Paul A.

AU - Arnold, Carolyn A.

AU - Georgiou-Karistianis, Nellie

AU - Giummarra, Melita J.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Seeking or receiving compensation after injury is frequently associated with poor recovery. Previous research has shown that the stressful nature of compensation procedures and perceived injustice may cause secondary harm. This study examined compensation system experiences in compensation claimants in Victoria, Australia, and explored the relationship between these experiences and injury outcomes. One hundred and sixty compensable patients (120 male, 75.0 %) aged 18–67 years (M = 43.01, SD = 14.31), hospitalized for an injury in a motor vehicle crash (n = 137) or at work (n = 23), participated. Participants completed questionnaires about compensation system experience, pain, and psychological symptoms 12 months after injury. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the compensation system experience items revealed three components explaining 66.64 % of the variance in compensation experience: (1) “negative procedural experience” (47.29 %), (2) “compensation supported recovery” (10.43 %), and (3) “positive procedural experience” (8.92 %). Worse experience on all components was associated with worse pain (severity, interference, catastrophizing, disability) and psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, PTSD, perceived injustice). Compensation system experience reflected both negative and positive procedural factors, and feeling supported through recovery. Most participants reported having positive experiences; however, those who were frustrated or stressed from compensation procedures had worse pain and psychological health outcomes. While this association is likely to be bidirectional with “non-recovery” also impacting on compensation experience appraisals, compensation schemes should nonetheless address modifiable sources of procedural injustice (e.g., arduous paperwork and approvals processes) and reinforce procedures that generate perceptions of support (e.g., timely and appropriate access to health services).

AB - Seeking or receiving compensation after injury is frequently associated with poor recovery. Previous research has shown that the stressful nature of compensation procedures and perceived injustice may cause secondary harm. This study examined compensation system experiences in compensation claimants in Victoria, Australia, and explored the relationship between these experiences and injury outcomes. One hundred and sixty compensable patients (120 male, 75.0 %) aged 18–67 years (M = 43.01, SD = 14.31), hospitalized for an injury in a motor vehicle crash (n = 137) or at work (n = 23), participated. Participants completed questionnaires about compensation system experience, pain, and psychological symptoms 12 months after injury. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the compensation system experience items revealed three components explaining 66.64 % of the variance in compensation experience: (1) “negative procedural experience” (47.29 %), (2) “compensation supported recovery” (10.43 %), and (3) “positive procedural experience” (8.92 %). Worse experience on all components was associated with worse pain (severity, interference, catastrophizing, disability) and psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, PTSD, perceived injustice). Compensation system experience reflected both negative and positive procedural factors, and feeling supported through recovery. Most participants reported having positive experiences; however, those who were frustrated or stressed from compensation procedures had worse pain and psychological health outcomes. While this association is likely to be bidirectional with “non-recovery” also impacting on compensation experience appraisals, compensation schemes should nonetheless address modifiable sources of procedural injustice (e.g., arduous paperwork and approvals processes) and reinforce procedures that generate perceptions of support (e.g., timely and appropriate access to health services).

KW - Compensation

KW - Injustice

KW - Motor vehicle collision

KW - Pain

KW - Psychological functioning

KW - Trauma

KW - Workplace injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992694916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12207-016-9275-1

DO - 10.1007/s12207-016-9275-1

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 376

EP - 389

JO - Psychological Injury and Law

JF - Psychological Injury and Law

SN - 1938-971X

IS - 4

ER -