Comparison of the safety and efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in the elderly: a review of the ANZSCTS database

Vikrant Dhurandhar; Akshat Saxena; Roneil N Parikh; Michael P Vallely; Michael Keith Wilson; Jennifer Kay Butcher; Deborah Black; Lavinia Tran; Christopher Michael Reid; Paul G Bannon

doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in the elderly: a review of the ANZSCTS database

Vikrant Dhurandhar, Akshat Saxena, Roneil N Parikh, Michael P Vallely, Michael Keith Wilson, Jennifer Kay Butcher, Deborah Black, Lavinia Tran, Christopher Michael Reid, Paul G Bannon

Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Alfred Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The elderly population (age >70 years) incurs greater mortality and morbidity following CABG. Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may mitigate these otucomes. A retrospective analysis of the results of OPCAB in this population was performed. Methods: We reviewed the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) database for elderly patients (n=12697) undergoing isolated CABG surgery and compared the on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) (n=11676) with OPCAB (n=1021) technique. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors, and postoperative outcomes were analysed. Survival analyses was performed after cross-matching the database with the national death registry to identify long-term mortality. Results: High-risk patients were more prevalent in the ONCAB group (p

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1225 - 1232
Number of pages	8
Journal	Heart Lung and Circulation
Volume	24
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162
Publication status	Published - 2015

Access to Document

10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162

Cite this

Dhurandhar, V., Saxena, A., Parikh, R. N., Vallely, M. P., Wilson, M. K., Butcher, J. K., Black, D., Tran, L., Reid, C. M., & Bannon, P. G. (2015). Comparison of the safety and efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in the elderly: a review of the ANZSCTS database. Heart Lung and Circulation, 24(12), 1225 - 1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162

@article{a3138bcec747419b8622ae23455f9d14,

title = "Comparison of the safety and efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in the elderly: a review of the ANZSCTS database",

abstract = "Background: The elderly population (age >70 years) incurs greater mortality and morbidity following CABG. Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may mitigate these otucomes. A retrospective analysis of the results of OPCAB in this population was performed. Methods: We reviewed the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) database for elderly patients (n=12697) undergoing isolated CABG surgery and compared the on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) (n=11676) with OPCAB (n=1021) technique. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors, and postoperative outcomes were analysed. Survival analyses was performed after cross-matching the database with the national death registry to identify long-term mortality. Results: High-risk patients were more prevalent in the ONCAB group (p",

author = "Vikrant Dhurandhar and Akshat Saxena and Parikh, {Roneil N} and Vallely, {Michael P} and Wilson, {Michael Keith} and Butcher, {Jennifer Kay} and Deborah Black and Lavinia Tran and Reid, {Christopher Michael} and Bannon, {Paul G}",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "1225 -- 1232",

journal = "Heart Lung and Circulation",

issn = "1443-9506",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "12",

}

Dhurandhar, V, Saxena, A, Parikh, RN, Vallely, MP, Wilson, MK, Butcher, JK, Black, D, Tran, L , Reid, CM & Bannon, PG 2015, 'Comparison of the safety and efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in the elderly: a review of the ANZSCTS database', Heart Lung and Circulation, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1225 - 1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in the elderly: a review of the ANZSCTS database. / Dhurandhar, Vikrant; Saxena, Akshat; Parikh, Roneil N et al.
In: Heart Lung and Circulation, Vol. 24, No. 12, 2015, p. 1225 - 1232.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the safety and efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in the elderly: a review of the ANZSCTS database

AU - Dhurandhar, Vikrant

AU - Saxena, Akshat

AU - Parikh, Roneil N

AU - Vallely, Michael P

AU - Wilson, Michael Keith

AU - Butcher, Jennifer Kay

AU - Black, Deborah

AU - Tran, Lavinia

AU - Reid, Christopher Michael

AU - Bannon, Paul G

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: The elderly population (age >70 years) incurs greater mortality and morbidity following CABG. Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may mitigate these otucomes. A retrospective analysis of the results of OPCAB in this population was performed. Methods: We reviewed the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) database for elderly patients (n=12697) undergoing isolated CABG surgery and compared the on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) (n=11676) with OPCAB (n=1021) technique. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors, and postoperative outcomes were analysed. Survival analyses was performed after cross-matching the database with the national death registry to identify long-term mortality. Results: High-risk patients were more prevalent in the ONCAB group (p

AB - Background: The elderly population (age >70 years) incurs greater mortality and morbidity following CABG. Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may mitigate these otucomes. A retrospective analysis of the results of OPCAB in this population was performed. Methods: We reviewed the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) database for elderly patients (n=12697) undergoing isolated CABG surgery and compared the on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB) (n=11676) with OPCAB (n=1021) technique. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors, and postoperative outcomes were analysed. Survival analyses was performed after cross-matching the database with the national death registry to identify long-term mortality. Results: High-risk patients were more prevalent in the ONCAB group (p

UR - http://goo.gl/o2knyU

U2 - 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162

DO - 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.04.162

M3 - Article

SN - 1443-9506

VL - 24

SP - 1225

EP - 1232

JO - Heart Lung and Circulation

JF - Heart Lung and Circulation

IS - 12

ER -

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of On-Pump (ONCAB) versus Off-Pump (OPCAB) Coronary Artery Bypass graft surgery in the elderly: a review of the ANZSCTS database

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this