TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of stormwater biofiltration systems in Southeast Australia and Southern California
AU - Ambrose, Richard F
AU - Winfrey, Brandon Kyle
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Partnerships in International Research and Education (PIRE) grant OISE-1243543 to the University of California, Irvine (UCI). We appreciate discussions we have had with PIRE team members, especially Stan Grant of UCI and Ana Deletic and Belinda Hatt of Monash University. We also thank stormwater managers and others in Melbourne and California including Tim Fletcher, Chris Walsh, and Matt Burns of University of Melbourne, Wing Tam, Susie Santilena, and Deborah Deets of the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation, and Bhaskar Joshi and Mark Keisler of California Department of Transportation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Stormwater biofilters (also called rain gardens, bioretention systems, and bioswales) are used to manage stormwater runoff in urbanized environments. Some benefits of biofilters include flood prevention, stormwater runoff water quality improvement, and wildlife habitat. This technology has been implemented on a larger scale in southeast Australia, but cities and counties in southern California just beginning to construct biofilter systems to manage stormwater runoff. Biofilters tend to be larger in southern California than in southeast Australia. Differences in rainfall patterns likely affect biofilter function. Southern California has much longer periods between rain events than southeast Australia, providing challenges to establishing and maintaining vegetation in biofilters. The use of biofilters for restoring predevelopment flow regimes has been studied in a peri-urban watershed in southeast Australia, but flow regime restoration is not likely in highly urbanized locations in both Australia and southern California. However, stormwater runoff treatment and harvesting in decentralized biofilters could substantially reduce storm flows and improve water quality in receiving waters while improving urban water supply and extending the life of existing stormwater management infrastructure.
AB - Stormwater biofilters (also called rain gardens, bioretention systems, and bioswales) are used to manage stormwater runoff in urbanized environments. Some benefits of biofilters include flood prevention, stormwater runoff water quality improvement, and wildlife habitat. This technology has been implemented on a larger scale in southeast Australia, but cities and counties in southern California just beginning to construct biofilter systems to manage stormwater runoff. Biofilters tend to be larger in southern California than in southeast Australia. Differences in rainfall patterns likely affect biofilter function. Southern California has much longer periods between rain events than southeast Australia, providing challenges to establishing and maintaining vegetation in biofilters. The use of biofilters for restoring predevelopment flow regimes has been studied in a peri-urban watershed in southeast Australia, but flow regime restoration is not likely in highly urbanized locations in both Australia and southern California. However, stormwater runoff treatment and harvesting in decentralized biofilters could substantially reduce storm flows and improve water quality in receiving waters while improving urban water supply and extending the life of existing stormwater management infrastructure.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84943417782
U2 - 10.1002/WAT2.1064
DO - 10.1002/WAT2.1064
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84943417782
SN - 2049-1948
VL - 2
SP - 131
EP - 146
JO - WIREs Water
JF - WIREs Water
IS - 2
ER -