Abstract
Background: Despite COVID-19 infection being less severe in children compared to adults, vaccination for children from the age of 6 months onwards is recommended in many countries to reduce symptom severity and prevent severe disease. However, vaccination against COVID-19 for children remains controversial and uptake has been low. Aims: To assess and compare the rate of change of parent-reported COVID-19 vaccine uptake in children aged 5 to 11 years and motivators of vaccine acceptance and non-vaccination among parents/guardians in Canada and Australia. Methods: As part of the iCARE study, two cross-sectional representative samples in Canada and Australia were collected between May 20 and September 12, 2022 (i.e., 5 and 9 months after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout for children 5–11 years) using online panels. Parents/guardians reported the vaccine status of their children and motivators for vaccine acceptance and non-vaccination. General linear models were used to estimate differences between countries in terms of vaccine uptake and motivators across time. Results: Parent-reported vaccine uptake for children 5–11 years didn't increase over the study period (T1 = 87 %,T2 = 86 %; OR = 0.83; 95 %CI = 0.45–1.54) and was overall lower in Canada (60.8 %) compared to Australia (71.6 %)(OR = 0.56; 95 %CI = 0.33–0.96). In both countries the socioeconomic characteristics of parents who didn't vaccinate their children were similar and having information on either the short- or long-term side effects of the vaccine were important motivators. However, vaccine effectiveness was more important in Canada and trust in the company that developed the vaccine and a recommendation from the child's doctor were more important motivators in Australia. Conclusion: Parent-reported vaccine uptake for children 5–11 years plateaued early in the vaccine rollout. The main motivators for parents of unvaccinated children varied between the two countries but information on vaccine safety and effectiveness were common to both countries. Findings may inform future tailored vaccine communication efforts and pandemic planning in Australia and Canada to optimize vaccine uptake for primary school children.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 126057 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Vaccine |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 23 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Oct 2024 |
Keywords
- Behavioural medicine
- COVID-19
- Pediatric
- Vaccine
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Vaccine, Vol. 42, No. 23, 126057, 03.10.2024.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of parent-reported motivators of non-vaccination for children 5–11 years old in Australia and Canada
T2 - Results of the iCARE study
AU - Deslauriers, Frédérique
AU - Hoq, Monsurul
AU - Kaufman, Jessica
AU - Enticott, Joanne
AU - Lavoie, Kim L.
AU - Bacon, Simon L.
AU - Danchin, Margie
A2 - Boyle, Jacqueline A.
N1 - Funding Information: Lead investigatorsKim L. Lavoie, PhD, University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM) and CIUSSS-NIM, CANADA; Simon L. Bacon, PhD, Concordia University and CIUSSS-NIM, CANADA. Collaborators (in alphabetical order): ARGENTINA: Nora Granana, PhD, Hospital Durand; AUSTRALIA: Jacqueline Boyle, PhD, Monash University; Margie Danchin, PhD, Melbourne Medical School; Joanne Enticott, PhD, Monash University; Jessica Kaufman, PhD, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; AUSTRIA: Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, MD, Medizinische Universit\u00E4t Wien; BRAZIL: Eduardo Caputo, PhD, Universidade Federal de Pelotas; CANADA: Mohamad Baydoun, PhD, University of Regina; Andrea Gershon, PhD, Sunnybrook Research Institute; Ariane B\u00E9langer-Gravel, PhD, Universit\u00E9 Laval; Tavis Campbell, PhD, University of Calgary; Linda Carlson, PhD, University of Calgary; Kim Corace, PhD, University of Ottawa; Rubee Dev, PhD, University of British Colombia; Olivier Drouin, MD, CHU Sainte-Justine/Universit\u00E9 de Montr\u00E9al; Gary Garber, PhD, University of Ottawa/Public Health Ontario; Samir Gupta, MD, University of Toronto; Catherine Herba PhD, UQAM; Jack Jedwab, PhD, Canadian Institute for Identities and Migration and the Association for Canadian Studies; Keven Joyal-Desmarais, PhD, Concordia University; Joanne Liu, PhD, McGill University; Sandra Pelaez, PhD, Universit\u00E9 Version: 2022-08-17 de Montr\u00E9al; Paul Poirier, MD, Universit\u00E9 Laval; Justin Presseau, PhD, University of Ottawa; Eli Puterman, PhD, University of British Columbia; Joshua Rash, PhD, Memorial University; Johanne Saint-Charles, PhD, UQAM; Jovana Stojanovic, PhD, Concordia University; Michael Spivock, PhD, Shared Services Canada; Genevi\u00E8ve Szczepanik, PhD, MBMC; Michael Vallis, PhD, Dalhousie University; Vincent Gosselin Boucher, PhD, The University of British Columbia, Faculty of Eduction, School of Kinesiology; Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald, PhD, Department of Psychology, Universit\u00E9 du Qu\u00E9bec \u00E0 Trois-Rivi\u00E8res; Tamara Cohen, PhD, University of British Colombia; Alysha Deslippe, PhD, University of British Colombia. COLOMBIA: Mariantonia Lemos-Hoyos, PhD, Universidad EAFIT; CYPRUS: Angelos Kassianos, PhD, University of Cyprus; FRANCE: Gregory Ninot, PhD, Universit\u00E9 de Montpellier; Mathieu Beraneck, PhD, Universit\u00E9 Paris Cit\u00E9, CNRS; GERMANY: Beate Ditzen, PhD, Heidelberg University; GREECE: Theodora Skoura, PhD, Aretaieio Hospital Athens University; INDIA: Delfin Lovelina Francis MDS (PhD) Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, SIMATS; IRELAND: Hannah Durand, PhD, University of Stirling; Oonagh Meade, PhD, University of Galway; Gerry Molloy, PhD, University of Galway; Chris Noone, PhD, University of Galway; ITALY: Stefania Paduano, PhD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Valeria Raparelli, MD PhD, University of Ferrara; KENYA: Hildah Oburu, PhD, University of Nairobi. NEPAL: Niroj Bhandari, MBBS, Institute for Implementation Science and Health. SAUDI ARABIA: Abu Zeeshan Bari, PhD, Taibah University; SLOVAKIA: Iveta Nagyova, PhD, PJ Safarik University - UPJS; SWITZERLAND: Susanne Fischer, PhD, University of Zurich; TURKEY: Ceprail \u015Eim\u015Fek, MD Health Science University; UK: Joanne Hart, PhD, Manchester University; Lucie Byrne-Davis, PhD, University of Manchester; Nicola Paine, PhD, Loughborough University; Susan Michie, PhD, University College London; USA: Michele Okun, PhD, University of Colorado; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin, PhD, University of Michigan; Johannes Thrul, PhD, John Hopkins University; Abebaw Yohannes, PhD, Azusa Pacific University. Students (in alphabetical order): AUSTRALIA: Shrinkhala Dawadi, MSc, Monash University; Kushan Ranakombu, PhD, Monash University; BRAZIL: Daisuke Hayashi Neto, Msc, Unicamp; CANADA: Fr\u00E9d\u00E9rique Deslauriers, BA, UQAM and CIUSSS-NIM; Amandine Gagnon-H\u00E9bert, BA, UQAM and CIUSSS-NIM; Mahrukh Jamil, BA, Concordia University and CIUSSS-NIM; Camille L\u00E9ger, BSc, UQAM and CIUSSS-NIM; Callum MacLeay, BA, UQAM and CIUSSS-NIM; Ariany Marques Vieira, MSc, Concordia University and CIUSSS-NIM; Sarah O'Connor, BA, Universit\u00E9 Laval; Zackary van Allen, PhD, University of Ottawa; COLOMBIA: Susana Torres, MSc, Universidad EAFIT. Funding Information: iCARE is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR: MM1-174903; MS3-173099; SMC-151518; PJT-479128), the Canada Research Chairs Program (950\u2013232522, chair holder: Dr. Kim L. Lavoie), the Fonds de recherche du Qu\u00E9bec-sant\u00E9 (FRQ-S: 251,618 and 34757), the Fonds de Recherche du Qu\u00E9bec- soci\u00E9t\u00E9 et Culture (FRQSC: 2019-SE1-252541), and the Minist\u00E8re de l\u2019\u00C9conomie et de l\u2019Innovation du Qu\u00E9bec (2020\u20132022-COVID-19-PSOv2a-51754). Ms. Deslauriers is supported by a CIHR Master scholarship (CGS-M), Canada Graduate Scholarship \u2013 Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement (CGS-MSFSS: FSS-186441) and the Mitacs Global Research Award. The study sponsors had no role in the design of the study, data collection, or analyses. Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/10/3
Y1 - 2024/10/3
N2 - Background: Despite COVID-19 infection being less severe in children compared to adults, vaccination for children from the age of 6 months onwards is recommended in many countries to reduce symptom severity and prevent severe disease. However, vaccination against COVID-19 for children remains controversial and uptake has been low. Aims: To assess and compare the rate of change of parent-reported COVID-19 vaccine uptake in children aged 5 to 11 years and motivators of vaccine acceptance and non-vaccination among parents/guardians in Canada and Australia. Methods: As part of the iCARE study, two cross-sectional representative samples in Canada and Australia were collected between May 20 and September 12, 2022 (i.e., 5 and 9 months after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout for children 5–11 years) using online panels. Parents/guardians reported the vaccine status of their children and motivators for vaccine acceptance and non-vaccination. General linear models were used to estimate differences between countries in terms of vaccine uptake and motivators across time. Results: Parent-reported vaccine uptake for children 5–11 years didn't increase over the study period (T1 = 87 %,T2 = 86 %; OR = 0.83; 95 %CI = 0.45–1.54) and was overall lower in Canada (60.8 %) compared to Australia (71.6 %)(OR = 0.56; 95 %CI = 0.33–0.96). In both countries the socioeconomic characteristics of parents who didn't vaccinate their children were similar and having information on either the short- or long-term side effects of the vaccine were important motivators. However, vaccine effectiveness was more important in Canada and trust in the company that developed the vaccine and a recommendation from the child's doctor were more important motivators in Australia. Conclusion: Parent-reported vaccine uptake for children 5–11 years plateaued early in the vaccine rollout. The main motivators for parents of unvaccinated children varied between the two countries but information on vaccine safety and effectiveness were common to both countries. Findings may inform future tailored vaccine communication efforts and pandemic planning in Australia and Canada to optimize vaccine uptake for primary school children.
AB - Background: Despite COVID-19 infection being less severe in children compared to adults, vaccination for children from the age of 6 months onwards is recommended in many countries to reduce symptom severity and prevent severe disease. However, vaccination against COVID-19 for children remains controversial and uptake has been low. Aims: To assess and compare the rate of change of parent-reported COVID-19 vaccine uptake in children aged 5 to 11 years and motivators of vaccine acceptance and non-vaccination among parents/guardians in Canada and Australia. Methods: As part of the iCARE study, two cross-sectional representative samples in Canada and Australia were collected between May 20 and September 12, 2022 (i.e., 5 and 9 months after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout for children 5–11 years) using online panels. Parents/guardians reported the vaccine status of their children and motivators for vaccine acceptance and non-vaccination. General linear models were used to estimate differences between countries in terms of vaccine uptake and motivators across time. Results: Parent-reported vaccine uptake for children 5–11 years didn't increase over the study period (T1 = 87 %,T2 = 86 %; OR = 0.83; 95 %CI = 0.45–1.54) and was overall lower in Canada (60.8 %) compared to Australia (71.6 %)(OR = 0.56; 95 %CI = 0.33–0.96). In both countries the socioeconomic characteristics of parents who didn't vaccinate their children were similar and having information on either the short- or long-term side effects of the vaccine were important motivators. However, vaccine effectiveness was more important in Canada and trust in the company that developed the vaccine and a recommendation from the child's doctor were more important motivators in Australia. Conclusion: Parent-reported vaccine uptake for children 5–11 years plateaued early in the vaccine rollout. The main motivators for parents of unvaccinated children varied between the two countries but information on vaccine safety and effectiveness were common to both countries. Findings may inform future tailored vaccine communication efforts and pandemic planning in Australia and Canada to optimize vaccine uptake for primary school children.
KW - Behavioural medicine
KW - COVID-19
KW - Pediatric
KW - Vaccine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196020082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.06.024
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.06.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 38880694
AN - SCOPUS:85196020082
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 42
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 23
M1 - 126057
ER -