Comparison of gene probe and conventional methods for the differentiation of ovine footrot isolates of Dichelobacter nodosus

Julian I. Rood, Pauline A. Howarth, Volker Haring, Stephen J. Billington, Weng K. Yong, Don Liu, Michael A. Palmer, David R. Pitman, Ian Links, David J. Stewart, Jill A. Vaughan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In a collaborative study that involved four Australian veterinary diagnostic laboratories a gene probe test based on the recombinant plasmids pJIR318, pJIR314B, and pJIR313, which contain genomic vap or vrl regions, was compared with conventional tests used for the differential diagnosis of ovine footrot. A total of 771 clinical Dichelobacter nodosus isolates were tested and designated as belonging to one of several gene probe categories. The results showed that 87% of the virulent isolates belonged to gene probe category 1, compared to only 6% of the benign isolates. It was concluded that there was good correlation between the gene probe test and the virulence designation of these isolates as well as the results of elastase, gelatin-gel and protease isoenzyme tests. Furthermore, the gene probe test was converted to a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based test. It is suggested that diagnostic laboratories consider carrying out both this PCR test and tests based on the extracellular proteases of D. nodosus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-141
Number of pages15
JournalVeterinary Microbiology
Volume52
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1996

Keywords

  • Dichelobacter nodosus
  • elastase
  • hybridization
  • sheep
  • vap
  • virulence
  • vrl

Cite this