Comparison of continuous flow versus demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with COPD

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rainer Gloeckl, Christian Osadnik, Lisa Bies, Daniela Leitl, Andreas Rembert Koczulla, Klaus Kenn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Demand oxygen delivery systems (DODS) enable prolongation of liquid oxygen cylinder life compared to continuous oxygen flow (CONT) use. Evidence is lacking, however, regarding their efficacy. This study investigated the literature comparing liquid-based CONT to DODS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Four electronic databases were searched from 1980 until January 2018. Primary outcomes were oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO 2 %) at rest and during exercise and exercise performance. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool. Data were analysed via meta-analysis where possible using the generic inverse variance method in Revman 5.3 or narrative synthesis. Ten crossover trials involving 152 patients with moderate to severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) range: 27–42% predicted) were included. There was a large degree of uncertainty regarding potential bias related to allocation concealment and blinding for all studies. Data from three studies (n = 44) showed no significant differences between DODS and CONT in terms of SpO 2 % at rest −0.2% (95% CI: −0.5% to 0.1%) or during exercise −0.3% (95% CI: −2.1% to 1.5%). The pooled mean difference of two studies (n = 56) in 6-min walk distance was 5.7 m (95% CI: −14.4 to 25.8 m). Findings were consistent between the meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. These findings from a limited number of studies suggest oxygen delivery via DODS or CONT confers similar effects in terms of SpO 2 % or exercise performance in patients with COPD. However, as DODS devices use various specifications that may yield large intra-individual differences, individual SpO 2 % testing appears advisable for those considering DODS use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-337
Number of pages9
JournalRespirology
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • chronic obstrutive pulmonary disease
  • hypoxemia
  • oxygen device
  • oxygen therapy

Cite this

Gloeckl, Rainer ; Osadnik, Christian ; Bies, Lisa ; Leitl, Daniela ; Koczulla, Andreas Rembert ; Kenn, Klaus. / Comparison of continuous flow versus demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with COPD : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Respirology. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 329-337.
@article{9e9af3cea2534abfb0e364e50ecde8e5,
title = "Comparison of continuous flow versus demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Demand oxygen delivery systems (DODS) enable prolongation of liquid oxygen cylinder life compared to continuous oxygen flow (CONT) use. Evidence is lacking, however, regarding their efficacy. This study investigated the literature comparing liquid-based CONT to DODS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Four electronic databases were searched from 1980 until January 2018. Primary outcomes were oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO 2 {\%}) at rest and during exercise and exercise performance. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool. Data were analysed via meta-analysis where possible using the generic inverse variance method in Revman 5.3 or narrative synthesis. Ten crossover trials involving 152 patients with moderate to severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) range: 27–42{\%} predicted) were included. There was a large degree of uncertainty regarding potential bias related to allocation concealment and blinding for all studies. Data from three studies (n = 44) showed no significant differences between DODS and CONT in terms of SpO 2 {\%} at rest −0.2{\%} (95{\%} CI: −0.5{\%} to 0.1{\%}) or during exercise −0.3{\%} (95{\%} CI: −2.1{\%} to 1.5{\%}). The pooled mean difference of two studies (n = 56) in 6-min walk distance was 5.7 m (95{\%} CI: −14.4 to 25.8 m). Findings were consistent between the meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. These findings from a limited number of studies suggest oxygen delivery via DODS or CONT confers similar effects in terms of SpO 2 {\%} or exercise performance in patients with COPD. However, as DODS devices use various specifications that may yield large intra-individual differences, individual SpO 2 {\%} testing appears advisable for those considering DODS use.",
keywords = "chronic obstrutive pulmonary disease, hypoxemia, oxygen device, oxygen therapy",
author = "Rainer Gloeckl and Christian Osadnik and Lisa Bies and Daniela Leitl and Koczulla, {Andreas Rembert} and Klaus Kenn",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/resp.13457",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "329--337",
journal = "Respirology",
issn = "1323-7799",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of continuous flow versus demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with COPD : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Gloeckl, Rainer; Osadnik, Christian; Bies, Lisa; Leitl, Daniela; Koczulla, Andreas Rembert; Kenn, Klaus.

In: Respirology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 329-337.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview ArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of continuous flow versus demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with COPD

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Gloeckl, Rainer

AU - Osadnik, Christian

AU - Bies, Lisa

AU - Leitl, Daniela

AU - Koczulla, Andreas Rembert

AU - Kenn, Klaus

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Demand oxygen delivery systems (DODS) enable prolongation of liquid oxygen cylinder life compared to continuous oxygen flow (CONT) use. Evidence is lacking, however, regarding their efficacy. This study investigated the literature comparing liquid-based CONT to DODS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Four electronic databases were searched from 1980 until January 2018. Primary outcomes were oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO 2 %) at rest and during exercise and exercise performance. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool. Data were analysed via meta-analysis where possible using the generic inverse variance method in Revman 5.3 or narrative synthesis. Ten crossover trials involving 152 patients with moderate to severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) range: 27–42% predicted) were included. There was a large degree of uncertainty regarding potential bias related to allocation concealment and blinding for all studies. Data from three studies (n = 44) showed no significant differences between DODS and CONT in terms of SpO 2 % at rest −0.2% (95% CI: −0.5% to 0.1%) or during exercise −0.3% (95% CI: −2.1% to 1.5%). The pooled mean difference of two studies (n = 56) in 6-min walk distance was 5.7 m (95% CI: −14.4 to 25.8 m). Findings were consistent between the meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. These findings from a limited number of studies suggest oxygen delivery via DODS or CONT confers similar effects in terms of SpO 2 % or exercise performance in patients with COPD. However, as DODS devices use various specifications that may yield large intra-individual differences, individual SpO 2 % testing appears advisable for those considering DODS use.

AB - Demand oxygen delivery systems (DODS) enable prolongation of liquid oxygen cylinder life compared to continuous oxygen flow (CONT) use. Evidence is lacking, however, regarding their efficacy. This study investigated the literature comparing liquid-based CONT to DODS in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Four electronic databases were searched from 1980 until January 2018. Primary outcomes were oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO 2 %) at rest and during exercise and exercise performance. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool. Data were analysed via meta-analysis where possible using the generic inverse variance method in Revman 5.3 or narrative synthesis. Ten crossover trials involving 152 patients with moderate to severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) range: 27–42% predicted) were included. There was a large degree of uncertainty regarding potential bias related to allocation concealment and blinding for all studies. Data from three studies (n = 44) showed no significant differences between DODS and CONT in terms of SpO 2 % at rest −0.2% (95% CI: −0.5% to 0.1%) or during exercise −0.3% (95% CI: −2.1% to 1.5%). The pooled mean difference of two studies (n = 56) in 6-min walk distance was 5.7 m (95% CI: −14.4 to 25.8 m). Findings were consistent between the meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. These findings from a limited number of studies suggest oxygen delivery via DODS or CONT confers similar effects in terms of SpO 2 % or exercise performance in patients with COPD. However, as DODS devices use various specifications that may yield large intra-individual differences, individual SpO 2 % testing appears advisable for those considering DODS use.

KW - chronic obstrutive pulmonary disease

KW - hypoxemia

KW - oxygen device

KW - oxygen therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058669071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/resp.13457

DO - 10.1111/resp.13457

M3 - Review Article

VL - 24

SP - 329

EP - 337

JO - Respirology

JF - Respirology

SN - 1323-7799

IS - 4

ER -