Comparing thermal performance curves across traits

How consistent are they?

Vanessa Kellermann, Steven L. Chown, Mads Fristrup Schou, Ian Aitkenhead, Charlene Janion-Scheepers, Allannah Clemson, Marina Telonis Scott, Carla M. Sgrò

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thermal performance curves (TPCs) are intended to approximate the relationship between temperature and fitness, and are commonly integrated into species distributional models for understanding climate change responses. However, TPCs may vary across traits because selection and environmental sensitivity (plasticity) differ across traits or because the timing and duration of the temperature exposure, here termed time scale, may alter trait variation. Yet, the extent to which TPCs vary temporally and across traits is rarely considered in assessments of climate change responses. Using a common garden approach, we estimated TPCs for standard metabolic rate (SMR), and activity in Drosophila melanogaster at three test temperatures (16, 25 and 30°C), using flies from each of six developmental temperatures (16, 18, 20, 25, 28 and 30°C). We examined the effects of time scale of temperature exposure (minutes/ hours versus days/weeks) in altering TPC shape and position, and commonly used descriptors of the TPC: thermal optimum (Topt), thermal limits (Tmin and Tmax) and thermal breadth (Tbr). In addition, we collated previously published estimates of TPCs for fecundity and egg-to-adult viability in D. melanogaster. We found that the descriptors of the TPCs varied across traits (egg-to-adult viability, SMR, activity and fecundity), but variation in TPCs within these traits was small across studies when measured at the same time scales. The time scale at which traits were measured contributed to greater variation in TPCs than the observed variance across traits, although the relative importance of time scale differed depending on the trait (activity versus fecundity). Variation in the TPC across traits and time scales suggests that TPCs using single traits may not be an accurate predictor of fitness and thermal adaptation across environments.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberjeb193433
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Volume222
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Activity
  • Egg-to-adult viability
  • Fecundity
  • Metabolic rate
  • Plasticity
  • T

Cite this

Kellermann, Vanessa ; Chown, Steven L. ; Schou, Mads Fristrup ; Aitkenhead, Ian ; Janion-Scheepers, Charlene ; Clemson, Allannah ; Scott, Marina Telonis ; Sgrò, Carla M. / Comparing thermal performance curves across traits : How consistent are they?. In: Journal of Experimental Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 222, No. 11.
@article{6b351f90329d4e858c6243d47d7fc85c,
title = "Comparing thermal performance curves across traits: How consistent are they?",
abstract = "Thermal performance curves (TPCs) are intended to approximate the relationship between temperature and fitness, and are commonly integrated into species distributional models for understanding climate change responses. However, TPCs may vary across traits because selection and environmental sensitivity (plasticity) differ across traits or because the timing and duration of the temperature exposure, here termed time scale, may alter trait variation. Yet, the extent to which TPCs vary temporally and across traits is rarely considered in assessments of climate change responses. Using a common garden approach, we estimated TPCs for standard metabolic rate (SMR), and activity in Drosophila melanogaster at three test temperatures (16, 25 and 30°C), using flies from each of six developmental temperatures (16, 18, 20, 25, 28 and 30°C). We examined the effects of time scale of temperature exposure (minutes/ hours versus days/weeks) in altering TPC shape and position, and commonly used descriptors of the TPC: thermal optimum (Topt), thermal limits (Tmin and Tmax) and thermal breadth (Tbr). In addition, we collated previously published estimates of TPCs for fecundity and egg-to-adult viability in D. melanogaster. We found that the descriptors of the TPCs varied across traits (egg-to-adult viability, SMR, activity and fecundity), but variation in TPCs within these traits was small across studies when measured at the same time scales. The time scale at which traits were measured contributed to greater variation in TPCs than the observed variance across traits, although the relative importance of time scale differed depending on the trait (activity versus fecundity). Variation in the TPC across traits and time scales suggests that TPCs using single traits may not be an accurate predictor of fitness and thermal adaptation across environments.",
keywords = "Activity, Egg-to-adult viability, Fecundity, Metabolic rate, Plasticity, T",
author = "Vanessa Kellermann and Chown, {Steven L.} and Schou, {Mads Fristrup} and Ian Aitkenhead and Charlene Janion-Scheepers and Allannah Clemson and Scott, {Marina Telonis} and Sgr{\`o}, {Carla M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1242/jeb.193433",
language = "English",
volume = "222",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "The Company of Biologists Ltd",
number = "11",

}

Comparing thermal performance curves across traits : How consistent are they? / Kellermann, Vanessa; Chown, Steven L.; Schou, Mads Fristrup; Aitkenhead, Ian; Janion-Scheepers, Charlene; Clemson, Allannah; Scott, Marina Telonis; Sgrò, Carla M.

In: Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 222, No. 11, jeb193433, 06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing thermal performance curves across traits

T2 - How consistent are they?

AU - Kellermann, Vanessa

AU - Chown, Steven L.

AU - Schou, Mads Fristrup

AU - Aitkenhead, Ian

AU - Janion-Scheepers, Charlene

AU - Clemson, Allannah

AU - Scott, Marina Telonis

AU - Sgrò, Carla M.

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Thermal performance curves (TPCs) are intended to approximate the relationship between temperature and fitness, and are commonly integrated into species distributional models for understanding climate change responses. However, TPCs may vary across traits because selection and environmental sensitivity (plasticity) differ across traits or because the timing and duration of the temperature exposure, here termed time scale, may alter trait variation. Yet, the extent to which TPCs vary temporally and across traits is rarely considered in assessments of climate change responses. Using a common garden approach, we estimated TPCs for standard metabolic rate (SMR), and activity in Drosophila melanogaster at three test temperatures (16, 25 and 30°C), using flies from each of six developmental temperatures (16, 18, 20, 25, 28 and 30°C). We examined the effects of time scale of temperature exposure (minutes/ hours versus days/weeks) in altering TPC shape and position, and commonly used descriptors of the TPC: thermal optimum (Topt), thermal limits (Tmin and Tmax) and thermal breadth (Tbr). In addition, we collated previously published estimates of TPCs for fecundity and egg-to-adult viability in D. melanogaster. We found that the descriptors of the TPCs varied across traits (egg-to-adult viability, SMR, activity and fecundity), but variation in TPCs within these traits was small across studies when measured at the same time scales. The time scale at which traits were measured contributed to greater variation in TPCs than the observed variance across traits, although the relative importance of time scale differed depending on the trait (activity versus fecundity). Variation in the TPC across traits and time scales suggests that TPCs using single traits may not be an accurate predictor of fitness and thermal adaptation across environments.

AB - Thermal performance curves (TPCs) are intended to approximate the relationship between temperature and fitness, and are commonly integrated into species distributional models for understanding climate change responses. However, TPCs may vary across traits because selection and environmental sensitivity (plasticity) differ across traits or because the timing and duration of the temperature exposure, here termed time scale, may alter trait variation. Yet, the extent to which TPCs vary temporally and across traits is rarely considered in assessments of climate change responses. Using a common garden approach, we estimated TPCs for standard metabolic rate (SMR), and activity in Drosophila melanogaster at three test temperatures (16, 25 and 30°C), using flies from each of six developmental temperatures (16, 18, 20, 25, 28 and 30°C). We examined the effects of time scale of temperature exposure (minutes/ hours versus days/weeks) in altering TPC shape and position, and commonly used descriptors of the TPC: thermal optimum (Topt), thermal limits (Tmin and Tmax) and thermal breadth (Tbr). In addition, we collated previously published estimates of TPCs for fecundity and egg-to-adult viability in D. melanogaster. We found that the descriptors of the TPCs varied across traits (egg-to-adult viability, SMR, activity and fecundity), but variation in TPCs within these traits was small across studies when measured at the same time scales. The time scale at which traits were measured contributed to greater variation in TPCs than the observed variance across traits, although the relative importance of time scale differed depending on the trait (activity versus fecundity). Variation in the TPC across traits and time scales suggests that TPCs using single traits may not be an accurate predictor of fitness and thermal adaptation across environments.

KW - Activity

KW - Egg-to-adult viability

KW - Fecundity

KW - Metabolic rate

KW - Plasticity

KW - T

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067377088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.193433

DO - 10.1242/jeb.193433

M3 - Article

VL - 222

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 11

M1 - jeb193433

ER -